AMLC RECORDS DON’T PROVE ANYTHING VS DIGONG!

28 Sept. 2017

Before anybody gets FOOLED OR BRAINWASHED by character assassins of the Opposition, let’s be VERY CLEAR: Bank records from the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) which the Office of the Ombudsman says show some P1 billion in transactions in President Digong Duterte’s  accounts DO NOT PROVE ANY UNLAWFUL ACT by him, as others are desperately trying to show now.

In a story in gmanews.tv

(http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/news/nation/627512/trillanes-feels-vindicated-after-ombudsman-finds-basis-in-his-rap-vs-duterte/story/?top_picks&order=1), Overall Deputy Ombudsman Arthur Carandang said he has already requested the AMLC for a final validation of the bank transaction records of the first family. Very clear, ha, FINAL VALIDATION. NO INVESTIGATION AND FINDINGS YET! So anyone who says the AMLC records already prove claims, especially by Antonio Trillanes, that Digong is hiding billions in dirty wealth is  the DEVIL’S TEACHER IN LYING.

The Ombudsman also DID NOT SHOW OR EXPLAIN THE COMPUTATION on how they came up with the P1 billion. So, THERE’S NO CERTAINTY that Digong’s account contain P1 billion. To further enlighten you, guys: For example, if there is a P1 million deposit and subsequent withdrawals of P500,000 and P300,000 for a total of P800,000 there would only be P200,000 in the account. Anybody who says the total would be P1,800,000 is the KING OF IDIOTS who thinks you’re the MOST STUPID Filipino alive.

The Ombudsman said the plunder complaint filed by Trillanes against Digong was its basis in looking into the bank records of the President. But keep in mind, people, that Digong was ALREADY PRESIDENT when Trillanes filed his suit. Digong has been President FOR ONLY MORE THAN A YEAR. But the records the Ombudsman is checking include transactions YEARS AGO, when Digong was still mayor of Davao City. Digong was charged as President but the pieces of evidence include those WHEN HE WAS NOT the country’s Chief Executive yet.   

More to come, boys and girls. 30