I was informed a while ago that Leni Robredo
has still not paid the balance of the fee for her counter-protest against
Bongbong Marcos! So what is keeping the Presidential Electoral Tribunal (PET) from
DISMISSING her protest?
Bongbong was only given THREE DAYS or so to
pay the first installment of the fee for his protest against Leni. Since the
deadline fell on Good Friday, he was granted an extension, but only for a few days.
He has since paid the fee in full.
In the case of Leni, it’s been more than a
month or two since the deadline but still there are no reports that she has
settled. Leni asked for an extension but there have been no reports of a new
deadline, making that grace period INDEFINITE AND GROSSLY UNFAIR to Bongbong. Especially
considering the fact that when the PET first came out with Bongbong’s fee, Leni
IMMEDIATELY YELLED that his protest against her should be dismissed at once if
he fails to pay on time.
If there is a law providing Leni with
indefinite and unlimited extensions or privileges as sitting vice-president,
the PET should inform the people now. If
there’s none, then Leni’s protest against Bongbong should be dismissed at once
in the interest of fair play. She hasn’t come out to date with any proof of fraud
against Bongbong anyway. Anybody correct me if I’m wrong.
And as I’ve pointed out in earlier posts, we’re
probably the only country in the world wherein a protest was filed against a LOSING
CANDIDATE. 30
Nkakadismaya tlga tong mga judges nato...they are not after the welfare of the people but for some individuals only whom they favored...
ReplyDeleteThe PET is really UNFAIR! I can't believe that even the highest tribunal can not be trusted. This is a crystal clear example of CORRUPTION IN THE SC!Where can the people turn to if this is the kind of service the SC offers? SLOW AND BIAS!
ReplyDelete