Saturday, September 30, 2017

SHOW PROOF VS BONGBONG, IMEE!

Image result for images of bongbong and imee marcos




01 Oct. 2017

In a story in inquirer.net (http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/934483/lagman-says-imee-bongbong-partly-accountable-for-martial-law-abuses-duterte-imee-marcos-bongbong-marcos-edcel-lagman-politics), Congressman Edcel Lagman said Saturday President DIgong Duterte cannot just simply describe Imee and Bongbong Marcos as sinless during Martial Law. But other than saying that the two were “old enough when the documented atrocities and plunder were committed by the ‘conjugal dictatorship’ of Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos,” Lagman DID NOT CITE ANY SPECIFIC SIN of either Bongbong or Imee.

Now, I am NOT SAYING that Bongbong and Imee are innocent. ONLY a court of law can say that. We’re talking SPECIFICALLY about Bongbong and Imee so let’s go by the FACTS, and not just by the opinion or SENTIMENTS of anyone:

Except for God Almighty, MERE WORDS are not evidence. More than 45 years after Martial Law, neither Bongbong nor Imee has been convicted of or charged with, any criminal offense even if they were NO LONGER IN POWER. To date, NO ONE HAS COME OUT OR HAS PROVEN BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT any wrongdoing SPECIFCIALLY COMMITTED by either Bongbong or Imee. Lagman pointed out the killing of a guy who was found dead two days after he criticized Imee in an event in the ‘70s. But while damages were awarded to the victim’s family, it was not proven that Imee was directly responsible in any manner for the killing.  Anybody correct me if I’m wrong. Just be sure to have details.

I’m not a lawyer but I will dare say that there’s no law providing that a person should suffer for somebody else’s sin, especially if there’s no INDISPUTABLE EVIDENCE that he had been part of it.

So before Lagman says anything else against Bongbong or Imee, he had better have rock-hard physical proof and details ready. Otherwise, somebody had better remind him that he’s too old to be a rumormonger. 30


No comments:

Post a Comment