Saturday, September 30, 2017

BURDEN OF PROOF ON TRILLANES, OMBUDSMAN!

Image result for antonio trillanes




30 Sept. 2017

Whether they admit it or not, the BURDEN OF PROOF is now on the Office of the Ombudsman and Antonio Trillanes. Proof that they DID NOT COMMIT ANY CRIMINAL ACT in possessing data and copies of supposed records of bank accounts of President Digong Duterte and his kids.

Remember, people, the Office of the Ombudsman had claimed that it had received the records from the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC). But the AMLC DENIED having released any document to the Office of the Ombudsmnan. The AMLC also BELIED as WRONG AND MISLEADING figures in the supposed accounts which had been cited by Trillanes in his plunder complaint against Duterte.

That leaves only two possibilities – the records and data are either FAKE or had been OBTAINED ILLEGALLY.

So from where and whom did the records and data come from? WHO AUTHORIZED THE RELEASE AND WHERE is the WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION? Trillanes and the Office of the Ombudsman should show this if they’ll say they had not done anything wrong. The AMLC specifically said it had not even acted on the Ombudsman’s request for an investigation of Duterte bank records. Therefore, it would be ridiculous for them to release any record to the Ombudsman. So how come they still got supposed copies of and data from the records?  How or by what means, and what law or rule allowed them to have these despite the surrounding circumstances?


The Ombudsman is ignoring the AMLC denial and has vowed to pursue its probe of Duterte’s alleged hidden wealth. If they’ll fail to prove the LEGALITY of having possession of the records, and the authenticity of these, what will be the LEGAL BASIS of the probe? 30 

No comments:

Post a Comment