Wednesday, May 23, 2018

lLOILO CITY RECOUNT EXCLUSION ILLOGICAL, SUSPICIOUS



Here are TWO MORE REASONS why Leni Robredo’s plea to exclude votes from Iloilo City from the recount is both ILLOGICAL AND SUSPICIOUS!
                                               
KILALANG KAKAMPI ni Leni ang mayor ng Iloilo City, si Jed Mabilog, noong 2016 elections. Bilang mayor, KONTROLADO ni Mabilog ang naturang siyudad. So dapat, NANALO NG MALINIS AT MALAKI si Leni laban kay Bongbong. Kaya BAKIT AYAW NIYANG MAPASAMA SA RECOUNT ang mga boto ng Iloilo City? Kung tutuusin, DAPAT ay maging MASIGASIG si Leni na maisama sa recount ang mga balota dahil TERITORYO NG KAKAMPI NIYA ang siyudad.

Nang magbayad si Bongbong Marcos ng kaniyang protest fee, BUONG ILOILO ang kasama. TINANGGAP ng Presidential Electoral Tribunal (PET) ang bayad ng WALANG ANUMANG CLARIFICATION na ginawa tungkol sa Iloilo City WALA ring anumang sinabi si Leni o sinuman sa kampo niya. Bakit ngayong hinahanda na para sa recount ang mga balota ay BIGLANG AYAW nilang masama ang mga balota mula roon?

Lastly, didn’t Leni PROMISE BEFORE that she WOULD NOT FILE anything that could delay the recount anymore? Anybody correct me if I’m wrong. 30





3 comments:

  1. wlang illogical or suspicious..only one reason..no more marcos in malacanang...mahirap bang intindihin..kahit ano pang sabihin natin na masasakit sa PET ,kay Caguioa...at lenie..non sense..bakit?..kasi tao sila ng pamilyang traidor ng pilipinas..at ang mga bobong pilipino..ipinaglalaban parin sila..sana nga masakop na tayo ng instsik..pra nmnmaging stiff ang penalty..o kaya revolutionary government nlng..in both ways ...blood will flow..

    ReplyDelete
  2. I do not agree with unknown that the only reason is not to have a Marcos in Malacanang. They do not have that privilege but of course they can try as what they are doing at present. Also Unknown should not have insulted the Filipinos, they are not stupid as you think they are. DON'T BE HARSH to your countrymen.The Enemy is the liberal party!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Marcos or not Marcos the issue here were there really an election fraud?

    ReplyDelete