INVESTIGATE CHR FOR ILLEGAL DRUG LINKS

CHR CHAIRMAN CHITO GASCON

In a story in http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/978970/baseless-claims-linking-rights-groups-to-drugs-is-dangerous-chrn, the Commission on Human Rights (CHR) described as “dangerous” statements by some government officials that human rights groups may be “unwitting tools” of drug syndicates to destabilize the Duterte administration. The CHR added that supposed connivance remains “baseless.”

Then the CHR should be probed, too, for possible inks to drug syndicates. Why? The CHR should explain what makes them 100 percent sure that alleged links of human rights’ groups to drug lords/syndicates are baseless.

Anybody correct me if I’m wrong: Human rights’ groups ARE NOT CHR EMPLOYEES. Neither are they HOUSEMATES of CHR guys, especially Chairman Gascon. Therefore, there’s NO WAY the CHR WOULD KNOW 100 percent or 24 hours a day what human rights’ groups are doing every day. So WHY are they IMMEDIATELY DEFENSIVE of the groups? WHAT is the CHR’s BASIS that the groups have no ties to drug lords?

Especially considering the fact that human rights’ groups, as well as the CHR, HAVE NEVER CONDEMNED/ATTACKED illegal drugs and drug lords/syndicates? NOT ONCE. Even if a lot of police and other law enforcers HAVE BEEN KILLED by drug pushers/gangs, COUNTLESS drug addicts have died of various causes like disease and involvement in criminal activities and MILLIONS MORE DIE SLOWLY daily due to their addiction.

Lastly, it’s very clear that human rights’ groups are the subjects of the statements of some government officials on the possible links to drug lords/syndicates.  NOT THE CHR.

Kaya BAKIT CHR ang NAGRE-REACT, ang DEFENSIVE?  May NASAGASAAN siguro. 30