So Heherson ‘Sonny’ Alvarez has accepted the
challenge of Juan Ponce Enrile to anyone who says he lied on his claims on
Martial Law during his Facebook interview with Bongbong Marcos.
Good! Para magkaalaman agad ng katotohanan!
But here’s the catch:
Alvarez had better have PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE of
any argument or expose he’ll raise or come out with in the debate. Meaning, either
he witnessed or was part of whatever he’ll allege to have happened, or at the
very least has INDISPUTABLE AND VERIFIED PHYSICAL EVIDENCE to support whatever
claim he’ll make.
Anybody correct me if I’m wrong: Alvarez
LIVED IN THE US for years during Martial Law. I just can’t remember exactly from when to when.
So there is a very big possibility that
whatever he’ll say in the debate is based only on allegations or assumptions by
other people, or on UNVERIFIED reports from media and other sources of
information.
If that will be the case, then that’s HEARSAY
(TSISMIS). Only an IDIOT goes into a debate relying on hearsay, whether partially
or totally. And it doesn’t take a college diploma or post-graduate degree to
know that.
I hope it’s CRYTSAL-CLEAR that I’m not saying
that Enrile’s 100 percent correct. I’m only after the whole truth. Nothing
more. Nothing less.
***
***
Guys, in case you see ads around our blog, please support them with a click. They'e ads by google ad sense and google supports our blogspot. Thanks, always,and God bless. 30
No comments:
Post a Comment