KAYABANGAN, KAHIBANGAN NI ROBREDO

Nov. 17, 2016

KAYABANGAN, KAHIBANGAN NI ROBREDO!

A story in inquirer.net says Robredo wants Bongbong Marcos Jr. to move on following the dismissal by the Manila Prosecutor’s Office (MPO) of electoral cases filed against some personnel of Smartmatic and Comelec by his campaign adviser Jonathan dela Cruz. Pero tingnan ninyo, mga kababayan, kujng gaano na KALALA ANG KAYABANGAN, KAHIBANGAN at pagiging SARCASTIC ng kampo ni Leni Robredo.

Robredo’s lawyer, Beng Sardillo, was quoted in the story as saying:  “The dismissal means that they (Bongbong’s camp) failed to establish their case. Mr. Marcos, however, does not want to move on. His camp is now looking to the Department of Justice (DOJ) to rule in his favor. While the right to litigate is accorded to any person, fair play demands that we guard against false or baseless charges. There are times when we just need to accept the facts and the truth no matter how painful it might be.” Sardillo added that no amount of appeal can change things if evidence is lacking to warrant the case to be brought to court.

HINDI PORKE sinabi ng MPO ay IYUN NA ANG KATOTOHANAN AT TAMA. Sa apila ni Dela Cruz sa DOJ, tanging DOJ LAMANG ang may karapatang magsabi kung kulang nga ang naging ebidensiya niya. HINDI SI SARDILLO, o sinuman sa kampo ni Robredo. At kung saanman makarating ang kaso, WALANG KARAPATAN ang sinumang abugado na HUSGAHAN AGAD ang ebidensiya ng kabilang panig, lalo pa kung sasabihin niyang BASELESS o FALSE (kasinungalingan) ito. HUKUMAN o ang AHENSIYANG PAGSASAMPAHAN NG DEMANDA, ang may ganoong karapatan at kapangyarihan.

And Sardillo is the lawyer of Robredo, not of Bongbong. So unless she and hert bosses are DELUSIONAL EGOCENTRICS and are not aware of it, they have no professional or moral right to say that Bongbong’s camp cannot accept the truth. On the contrary,  Bongbong’s camp has accepted the truth of what they perceive as an erroneous resolution by the MPO. That\s why they are MOVING ON to the DOJ to seek remedies.. After all, moving on is NOT WHAT OR HOW Robredo’s camp wants it to be.

Lastly, the Robredo camp’s statements DID NOT cite any rebuttal to the following grounds for appeal  by Dela Cruz:  Under the Cyberbrime Prevention Act, intent or good faith was immaterial and “the mere commission thereof amounts to a breach in the confidentiality, integrity and availability of computer data and systems.” The change in the transparency server script was made without right or authority as admitted by Comelec commissioners, which is punishable under the Cybercrime Law. The MPO said the script change was with “mplied” right under the principle of Protocol of Escalation. But Dela Cruz said the principle did not apply because the matters raised in the script change pertained to incident management and not to change management. 30