The Commission on Audit’s (COA)
clarification of its 2011 national government audit report raised a lot of
questions on my mind.
First and foremost, the COA report was
specifically labeled for the year 2011. Not for the years 2010 and 2011, or
from the years 2007 to 2011. Just for 2011, alone.
So WHAT WAS THE BASIS for including
statistics and amounts from previous years? Is there ANY LAW or ACCOUNTING
PRINCIPLE which justifies, or requires this move? If there is any, please cite
and explain in detail.
If there is none, why did COA do it in
the first place?.
COA Chairperson Gracia Pulido-Tan said
the unliquidated cash advances reported in Table II.7-A of the COA report was
“as of” Dec. 31, 2011, indicating that this was an accumulation from prior
years.
Questions: Why were unliquidated cash
advances from prior years, If indeed there was any, included? How much was the unliquidated cash advances of the
Aquino Administration for 2011 alone?
Was this specified and detailed in the 2011 report? If yes, where? If no, why not?
What about for 2010?
Remember, people, Pnoy assumed power on the second half of 2010.
Was it cited and detailed in the 2010
COA report?
Tan cited audits of the province of Maguindanao
and selected municipalities in it and Department of Public Works and
Highways-Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao
which revealed billions of pesos in pecuniary loss for the years 2007 to
2009.
Questions: Why wasn’t a separate report
made for this? Before this was cited in the 2011 report, was COA 100 percent
sure that these supposed losses remaind questionable or unexplained and
unjustified
Deputy presidential spokesperson
Abigail Valte said the losses may not have resulted from graft.
Graft or not, the fact remains that the money WAS
NOT HANDLED PROPERLY, to say the least. Whether or not it’s due to THEFT,
INCOMPETENCE or whatever, P101 billion of our taxes was lost.
And it was the GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY to
safeguard it.
So the question now is what is the Aquino
Government doing for unliquidated cash advances under its administration? Is id
doing naything at all?
Valte said the Aquino administration was
committed to fighting graft and corruption, and had not been complacent in this
fight.
Really?
Then why did Pnoy himself bail out former Isabela Gov. Grace Padaca, who was
facing graft charges, and CATEGORICALLY AND PUBLICLY DECLARE he doesn’t think
she’s guilty?
Why
couldn’t Pnoy wait for the court to
decide on Padaca’s case? 30
No comments:
Post a Comment