A story in gmanews.tv reported that PET has
denied Leni Robredo's motion for it to follow the 25 percent shading threshold
set by the Comelec for a vote to be considered valid, (http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/news/nation/649852/pet-denies-robredo-bid-for-25-oval-shade-threshold-in-recount/story/)
The PET also said Leni’s claim of a
"systematic reduction" of her votes with the 50 percent threshold set
by the PET was "without basis and
shows a “MISUNDERSTANDING (emphasis mine) of the revision process."
NA-DENY NA yung petition ni Leni, lumabas
pang HINDI NIYA NAIINTINDIHAN ang ginawa niya, at ang sistema ng
revision/recount,
The good thing about this denial is Leni has
lost a possible reason to DELAY the revision/recount since her petition need
not go through hearings and other processes. Here are excerpts from the story:
"Protestee's (Leni) claim that the Commission on Elections
(Comelec) as purportedly confirmed by the Random Manual Audit Guidelines and
Report applies the 25% threshold percentage in determining a valid vote is INACCURATE
(emphasis mine)."The Court is not aware of any Comelec Resolution that
states the applicability of a 25% threshold; and the Tribunal cannot treat the
Random Manual Audit Guidelines and Report as proof of the threshold used by the
Comelec.”
The PET cited Comelec
Resolution No. 8804, as amended by Comelec Resolution No. 9164, which it said
does not mention the 25 percent threshold sought by Robredo.
"Prior to the amendment in Resolution No. 9164, Rule 15,
Section 6 of Resolution No. 8804 states that any shading less than 50% shall
not be considered a valid vote,"
which is consistent with PET rules. While the 2010 PET rules specify the
50-percent threshold, the 2018 Revisor's Guide "did not impose a new
threshold."
The PET also said Leni’s claim of a
"systematic reduction" of her votes with the 50 percent threshold set
by the PET was "without basis and
shows a “MISUNDERSTANDING (emphasis mine) of the revision process." Ballots under question, under the rules, will
be marked for examination by the PET.
ISIP-ISIP pag may time, Leni. 30
Napaka kapal ng pag mu2kha ng lugaw na yan, hindi yan marunong mahiya? Bulok na nga ang puke ng babaing yan? KBL
ReplyDeleteSaka paano yan mag iisip isip wala naman yang isip?
ReplyDeleteSaka paano yan mag iisip isip wala naman yang isip?
ReplyDeleteNapaka kapal ng pag mu2kha ng lugaw na yan, hindi yan marunong mahiya? Bulok na nga ang puke ng babaing yan? KBL
ReplyDeletelugaw malapit kana bilang na raw mo sa pagka VP
ReplyDeleteHanggang ngayon ba naman ay may mga MRs pa rin si Lugaw?Is she really confident she won? Why all these attempts to delay?Bakit ang tanga tanga ni Macalintal, di ba niya ipinaliwanag kay Lugaw na 50%threshold is counted but not less 50 %.Or baka naman Kas makalusot sila courtesy of Caguioa.
ReplyDeleteHanggang ngayon ba naman ay may mga MRs pa rin si Lugaw?Is she really confident she won? Why all these attempts to delay?Bakit ang tanga tanga ni Macalintal, di ba niya ipinaliwanag kay Lugaw na 50%threshold is counted but not less 50 %.Or baka naman Kas makalusot sila courtesy of Caguioa.
ReplyDeleteWatching from California:::: The problem with the RP's Supreme Court acting as PET is that they are delaying the arbitration results of BBM'S PROTEST. WHY??? I know these justices know the mantra of :JUSTICE DELAYED, JUSTICE DENIED". Three years of maltreatment of BBM'S protest is not good enough! WAKE UP PET JUSTICES... RENDER YOUR VERDICT BASED ON RESULTS AND NOT ON AFFINITY!
ReplyDelete