ONLY TWO major news websites came out with
stories on what transpired yesterday at the revision/recount of votes in
Bongbong Marcos’ protest against Leni Robredo,-- tribune.net.ph and
manilastandard.net. Here’s an excerpt from http://manilastandard.net/news/top-stories/262585/pet-recount-uncovers-excess-ballots-for-leni.html:
“There was a precinct in Bato in Camarines Sur
that registered the number of those who actually voted at 348 but the number of
valid votes found for revision was 376 or an excess of 28 votes in one precinct
alone. How did that happen? Where did the 28 votes come from?” a source at the
PET who wished not to be named said. The source added that all the
additional 28 votes were for Leni Robredo.
My theory: The excess 28 ballots for Leni was
DELIBERATELY PLACED INSIDE the valid votes for revision either after the 348
actual votes had been tallied or when the FINAL APPROVAL for the
revision/recount was granted by the Supreme Court, acting as the Presidential
Electoral Tribunal (PET).
Ang sinumang magsasabing misplaced lamang ang
28 balota, o magbibighay ng anumang depensa, SIGURUHIN LANG NA MAY MAIHAHARAP
NA TAO AT EBIDENSIYA na magpapatunayng sasabihin nila. Kung walangh testigo at
ebidensiya at salita lamang mayroon,
BALIW LAMANG sa mental hospital ang maniniwala sa inyo.
The numbers may be small. But the point is:TULUY-TULOY
ang DAYAANG NADIDISKUBRE, mga kababayan – mga basing balota, pre=shaded na mga
balota para kay Leni na HINDI NAGAMIT KUNO, etc. At ISANG PROPBINSIYA pa lamang, Camarines Sur,
sa halos 30 probinsiya at siyudad na sakop ng protesta ni Bongbong, ang
nire-recount. At mahigit 1,500 ang presinto sa Camarines Sur.
I am not a lawyer but I will dare say that
whether the numbers are big or small, CHEATING IS CHEATING. Anybody correct me if I’m wrong. 30
No comments:
Post a Comment