As
I’ve stated before, the Atimonan killings is much deeper than we think.
Relieved
Calabarzon (Cavite
In
TOTAL CONTRADICTION to earlier published claims by Ochoa that the Atimonan
operation had been disapproved by Malacanang.
A
story in manilastandard today.com quoted Melad as telling reporters: “In fact,
in the declaration of the PAOCC, the disapproval is only on the portion of
funding … it’s go pa rin.”
Melad
did not show proof of his allegations. But think about this, boys and girls,
and this IS NOT IN DEFENSE of him:
Melad
would NOT DARE BELIE OCHOA, the SECOND HIGHEST official in the Cabinet, if he
had no basis. I’m not saying that I believe him 100 percent. But he definitely
knows that Ochoa can LITERALLY DO ANYTHING with him if he can’t prove what he’s
saying, totally or partially.
If
the operation wasn’t really approved, WHY didn’t Ochoa IMMEDIATELY QUESTION or
ordered Melad to explain IMMEDIATELY after it happened?
Was
anybody among police and military officials questioned by anyone in Malacanang
right after the killings, since they say the operation had been disapproved in
the first place?
If
Ochoa or anyone else in Malacanang will say that Melad wasn’t directly under
him, then did he order DILG Sec. Mar Roxas to question the police official? If
yes, what was the result? If no, why not?
Why
did it take more than a week before Melad was disciplined?
Ochoa
should also categorically clarify if he had ever suggested an interrogation of
Ochoa to PNoy. Again, if yes, what happened? If no, why?
The
operational plan for the Atimonan killings had been reported earlier as
confidential. But with Melad belying Ochoa’s pronouncement, somebody had better
produce a certified true copy of it.
And
reveal the details as well, like when was it submitted, by whom, who exactly
disapproved it in the PAOCC and why?
Ang
hindi maglabas ng kopya at magbigay ng detalye nung operational plan, MAY
ITINATAGO. 30
No comments:
Post a Comment