MALIWANAG na gusto lang ni Leni Robredo na LOKOHIN ang sambayanan, sa
apila niya na ang 25 percent threshold sa pagshade sa balota na inaprubahan ng
Comelec ang dapa tmnaging basehan sa recount, Hindi ang 50 percent na idineklara na ng PET.
Here’s an excerpt from a
story in http://www.journal.com.ph/news/nation/marcos-camp-takes-cudgels-up-for-pet
on the CRYSTAL-CLEAR reaction of Bongbong’s lawyer Vic Rodriguez:
“The election case was filed
by BBM June of 2016 and since then jurisdiction of the case is with the PET and
no other as provided by Article 8 of the Constitution. Since it is the Rules of
the Tribunal that shall apply, her invocation of the 25% threshold rule is
erroneous as it was made by the Comelec only on 6 September 2016, four months
after the elections. It is an obvious ploy on the part of the Comelec, then led
by the impeached chairman Andres Bautista, to favor Robredo once revision
process starts.” Even a high school student will understand this.
APAT NA BUWAN nang hawak ng
PET ang protesta ni Bongbong nang ilabas ng Comelec iyung 25 percent threshold. Kaya NATURAL na ang PET na ang masusunod. HINDI ang Comelec. Kaya ang tanong:
Talaga bang SAKSAKAN LAMANG NG TANGA si Leni o may IREGULARIDAD sa 25 percent threshold
na makakatulong sa kaniya kayat’ PINAGPIPILITAN NIYA ITO?
Another thing: The Comelec chairman then was Andres ‘Andy’
Bautista. He is also a lawyer, a good
one as claimed by people who knew him. So he knows that the PET already had FULL
CONTROL of Bongbong’s protest when they came out with the 25 percent threshold.
But they still DID IT. For what reason? You’re guess is as good as mine. 30
Lalo lang pinasisikip ni Leni ang mundo niya. Abogado ba talaga ito?
ReplyDeletedapat husgahan ng mga hukom na yan ano ba ang tutuo andyan nmn mga evidincia sino talaga ang vise presedent mag tangatangahan na ba ang batas pag mahirap madali lang ang disisyon pag mayaman ang tagal
ReplyDelete