Monday, January 29, 2018

BONGBONG’S SOLID PROOF OF CHEATING

Image result for bongbong marcos

30 Jan. 2018

Bongbong Marcos has presented solid proof of cheating in the 2016 vice-presidential elections! These are the links to the stories in inquirer.net and philstar.com: (http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2018/01/30/1782714/bongbong-marcos-bares-evidence-fraud-vice-presidential-race),(http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/964581/marcos-presents-evidence-on-vote-manipulation-in-2016-polls).

With documents from the Presidential Electoral Tribunal (PET) as basis, Bongbong and his camp revealed and presented copies of the following in a press conference in Manila:

“Yung ibang balota kahit tatlo yung naka shade sa Vice President basta’t may square sa pangalan ni Mrs. [Leni] Robredo, binibilang po ang boto sa kanya. Ang question dito ano ang significance nung kahon? Di ba lagi nila sinasabi itiman ang bilog na hugis itlog. Wala naman sila sinabing kwadrado. Nawala yung oval, nawala yung itlog. Bakit nawala? Kung titingnan ninyo yung ballot images, noong 2010, 2013 andun yung bilog. Dito sa 2016, nawala, nasan napunta at bakit nawala yon?”

Examples of the fraud: An image of a ballot from San Nicolas, Iriga City, Camarines Sur showed that both the names of Leni Robredo and Antonio Trillanes IV had a black shade. But only the shade beside Leni’s name was inside a square. The vote summary later showed that the vote was counted for Leni, even if it should have been rejected for multiple marks. A ballot from Salvacion, Tigaon, Camarines Sur, had marks for both Gregorio Honasan and Leni. But only the one for Leni had a square beside her name. The vote summary eventually showed that the vote was counted for Leni instead of being nullified.

In Jilocon, San Jose, Negros Oriental, a ballot image showed that only Marcos’ name was marked. But in the summary of votes, the ballot was classified as an undervote. “Bakit yung boto ko naging undervote at hindi binilang? Bakit yung mga spoiled ballots ibinilang kay Robredo”

The Comelec created eight regional hubs but did not inform the candidates. As per a Comelec resolution, the hubs were to address problems in the SD cards. “Nobody knew about – not the public, not the candidates, not the party, nobody. Nobody knew about it except Comelec and Smartmatic.”

Bongbong’s points are self-explanatory so let me just add two things: It would be ridiculous to accuse him of having manufactured the ballot images he has since the Presidential Electoral Tribunal (PET) is keeping the originals. And to date, the Comelec HAS NOT MADE PUBLIC THE UNAUTHORIZED CHANGE made by Smartmatic on the script oif the transparency server for examination by private sector experts. 30



2 comments:

  1. the hash code Introduced to the system is the key to all of this..it may have brought in or Inserted a command wherein its primary purpose was to read the name of ms. Robredo only regardless of what the voter really indicated.. because it can't be on paper its too obvious...they have to go back to what was Introduced in the system and check the time when those boxes appeared..if they match..you have your smoking gun.

    ReplyDelete