22 Nov. 2017
An IDIOTIC DIVERSIONARY TACTIC
to confuse the people!
That is the aim of Leni Robredo’s
claim that some voters listed by Bongbong Marcos as witnesses from clustered precincts
in Lanao del Sur, Maguindanao and Basilan which are covered by his protest
against her were not registered for last year’s elections.
First and foremost, even if the
voters in question were indeed not registered, it DOES NOT FOLLOW that they don’t
know anything about what really happened in their areas on Election Day,
especially in Lanao del Sur. Or possibly
even have proof of unlawful activities that they had heard of or seen.
Second: The question on Lanao
del Sur, Basilan and Maguindanao is NOT about registered and unregistered
voters, or of recount of the votes. Bongbong’s petition for the three provinces is
for the declaration of FAILURE OF ELECTIONS THERE due to massive fraud. These
are two TOTALLY DIFFERENT ISSUES.
Third: Leni’s camp DID NOT
IDENTIFY THE SUPPOSED UNREGISTERED VOTERS. Yet, they specifically describe them
as such. How can you truthfully describe
somebody as something if you don’t even know his or her name?
Fourth: Leni’s camp did not
cite a law or rule that only those who voted in the 2016 polls can testify in
Bongbong’s protest against her.
Huwag paloloko, mga kababayan.
Tandaan, sa lahat ng nagpupumilit na malinis ang panalo niya, si Leni Robredo
lamang ang patuloy na LAHAT KINUKWESTIYON/HINAHARANG para huwag umusad ang
protesta at bilangan, na MAKAPAGPAPATUNAY kung talagang inosente siya. 30
No comments:
Post a Comment