SINO NGAYON ANG SINUNGALING SA ATIN, RAPPLER?

Ngayon ko lang nalaman, binansagan pala ng rappler na “False” ang blog ko na kung saan sinabi ko kay Bongbong Marcos protest supervising Justice Alfredo Benjamin Caguioa na “Ngayong MISMONG Presidential Electoral Tribunal (PET) Ad Hoc Committee na ang nagkumpirma ng DAYAAN noong 2016 election sa Camarines Sur I(CamSur) at sa Negros Oriental, WALA kang magagawa kundi ILABAS ANG RESULTA ng recount at paspasan na ang pagdiniing at pagdesisyon sa protesta ni Bongbong laban kay Leni Robredo (https://forumphilippines.blogspot.com/2019/05/wala-ka-nang-lusot-caguioa_27.html).

Sinabi pa ng Rapppler na: In a text message to Rappler, SC Public Information Office (PIO) chief Brian Hosaka said "there was no such confirmation or pronouncement by the PET." He added, "My office will make the appropriate announcements should there be one."

Ngayon, para sa kaalaman ng lahat, heto ang nakalagay sa storyang pinagbasehan ko ng aking blog:

The high court confirmed the findings of the PET Ad Hoc Committee that wet ballots were discovered and the election returns and ballot boxes were indeed violated. Heto ang link: https://www.manilatimes.net/sc-finds-more-wet-ballots/559054/.

At para mas malinaw pa sa lahat: The phrase “nagkumpirma ng dayaan” (https://forumphilippines.blogspot.com/2019/05/wala-ka-nang-lusot-caguioa_27.html) was mine ALONE DAHIL WALA AKONG ALAM NA IBANG PUWEDENG ITAWAG SA PAGBASA SA MGA BALOTA.  Kung sasabihin ng PET na hindi pandaraya ang pagkakabasa ng mga balota asahan ninyo, mga kababayan, na AGAD AKONG MAGSO-SORRY. Pero kung rappler lamang ang magsasabi, HINDI KO IINTINDIHIN AT I WILL STAND BY WHAT I SAID.

Lalo pa at nilagyan nila ng LANTARANG KASINUNGALINGAN ang banat nila sa akin.

The rappler blog post also claimed that according to my blog, the presence of wet ballots is "crystal-clear" evidence that Robredo "did not win" in Camarines Sur over former senator Bongbong Marcos (https://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/fact-check/231700-presidential-electoral-tribunal-committee-confirms-cheating-elections-2016?fbclid=IwAR180GaX3Z63InrxIENMam-TPkJG_R)

What I said in my blog was this: “With the discovery of wet ballots in CamSur, it’s now CRYSTAL-CLEAR that Robredo DID NOT WIN there by some 500,000 votes over Bongbong. So there’s NO LOGICAL REASON for you, Caguioa, to continue withholding the recount results from the public.” This is the link: https://forumphilippines.blogspot.com/2019/05/wala-ka-nang-lusot-caguioa_27.html

Rappler’s screen shot of my blog post in their attack on me showed that “some 500,000 votes there.” And yet, they CONVENIENTLY OMITTED OR ‘FORGOT’ that in the text of their counter post.

SINO NGAYON ANG SINUNGALING S AATIN, RAPPLER?

                                                    ***

May bago din po tayong FB page, FREE-FOR-ALL.Type lang ang FREE-FOR-ALL sa search box at enter. At makakatulong po ng malaki para araw-araw akong makapag-post kung iki-click ninyo at titingnan ang mga advertisement sa paligid ng ating blog. Salamat po lagi sa tiwala. God Bless us all.