14 Nov. 2017
Since there are STILL NO SIGNS that the
recount of votes covered by the protest of Bongbong Marcos against Leni Robredo
is about to begin, the Presidential Electoral Tribunal (PET) had better answer these
questions fast:
First: WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE if something
ILLEGAL happens to the ballots – TAMPERING, THEFT, ARSON, SWITCHING OR
SUBSTITUTION, ETC? What happens should,
God forbid, any of these criminal acts be carried out? Keep in mind, people,
there has been NO REPORT UP TO NOW from the PET or the Comelec on HOW SAFE are
the ballots in question.
Second: MORE THAN A YEAR after it was done,
the UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION by Smartmatic on the transparency server script has
not been shown by the Comelec to the public for private sector scrutiny. ONLY THE COMELEC is in possession of the
alteration, and has the SOLE CAPABILITY to do anything with it. Why wouldn’t
the PET order the Comelec to come out with the alteration, and have it examined
by private sector experts in the interest of FAIRNESS AND TRUTH? The same with
other possible pieces of evidence of cheating in Leni’s favor, like the LOADED
SD CARDS which the Comelec had first declared as unused during the 2016 polls. If
the PET has already ordered the Comelec, what was the response or compliance,
if any? If it has not, WHY NOT?
Third: WHAT OR WHO is preventing the PET from
SETTING THE START of the recount of the ballots? And WHY? As we all know,
Bongbong has PAID HIS PROTEST FEE IN FULL. He has also submitted ALL his evidence.
So WHAT OR WHO is keeping the PET from beginning with the recount? If they will
say nothing or nobody, what’s the problem? It’s just the start of the recount,
and not the decision on Bongbong’s protest. Why the seeming very LOW PRIORITY on the case.
I’ve said before, WE THE PEOPLE are the
BIGGEST LOSERS in this delay. It’s our HARD-EARNED TAXES and other fees we pay
to the government which pays for Leni’s salary, benefits and other expenses in
the Office of the Vice-President. With NO ASSURANCE that she’s the TRUE CHOICE
during the 2016 polls. For us to CONTINUE SPENDING for her is not just TOTALLY
UNFAIR BUT INHUMAN AND HIGHWAY ROIBBERY as well. 30
No comments:
Post a Comment