SERENO, CAGUIOA BETTER INHIBIT FROM MARCOS PROTEST!

Jan. 28, 2017

SERENO, CAGUIOA BETTER INHIBIT FROM MARCOS PROTEST!

If the Supreme Court (SC), acting as the Presidential Electoral Tribunal (PET) would still NOT SCHEDULE the start of sessions for the protest of Bongbong Marcos versus Leni Robredo, Chief Justice Ma. Lourdes Sereno and lead justice for the protest Alfredo Caguioa had better inhibit this early. And Sereno had better NAME ANOTHER JUSTICE who will decide AS SOON AS POSSIBLE ON WHEN TO BEGIN THE PROCEEDINGS.

I am zeroing in on Sereno and Caguioa in particular because as Chief Justice, Sereno has the FINAL APPROVAL on PET operations. Caguioa is the one who is supposed to evaluate everything and make all recommendations on the protest. Anybody correct me if I’m wrong.

Itama ako ninuman kung mali ako pero matapos isumite nina Bongbong at Leni ang kani-kanilang mga ebidensiya at iba pang kailangan, WALA NAMANG NABALITA hanggang ngayon na dahilan kung bakit hindi pa itinatakda ang simula ng proseso para sa protesta.

In filing for a petition for a preliminary conference, Bongbong noted that the last pleading on the protest was filed more than FOUR MONTHS AGO, on Sept. 9, 2016. But under the 2010 PET rules, the tribunal shall order a preliminary conference after the filing of the last pleading. If there are still hindrances to the start of the protest, the PET should reveal and explain ti to the public immediately  

ANO PA BA, O SINO PA BA ANG PUMIPIGIL SA PET?

We, the people, have the right to know because a KEY ELEMENT OF THE PROTEST IS OUR VOTES.  And it’s OUR TAXES, OUR MONEY, which is FINANCING LENI’S SALARY, ALLOIWANCES AND EXPENSES in the Office of the Vice-President. We have no obligation to spend on Leni INDEFINITELY as long as her victory is HIGHLY QUESTIONABLE.30