Friday, April 7, 2017

If YOU’RE REALLY INNOCENT, TRILLANES….

Image result for antonio trillanes














April 08, 2017

As expected, Antonio Trillanes has vigorously denied accusations by Davao City resident Guillermina Barrido that he had tried to bribe or coerce her into claiming that President Digong Duterte himself is involved in illegal drugs. So let me deal with this on CREDIBILITY AND LOGIC, two points, my dear readers.

On CREDIBILITY: First, if Trillanes is innocent as he claims: He should FILE LIBEL CHARGES IMMEDIATELY, as in at once, against Barrido and whoever came out with her claims in media.  It would be the fastest way to clear his name, and not just the public apology he has threatened to demand.  Second: He must PRESENT IN PUIBLIC the lawyer and his staff member whom Barrido had named in her claims.  Not just for no-holds barred questioning by media but, better yet, for a public confrontation with Barrido with FULL MEDIA COVERAGE.

Third: Trillanes should allow an independent examination of the video recording he had presented in a press conference which supposedly belies Barrido’s accusations. The FULL VIDEO RECORDING, and not just the three-minute sample had had shown. Fourth: Trillanes should explain why his people met Barrido outside instead of in his office.

On LOGIC:  Trillanes said according to Barrido, |nakita daw niya sa may pier
na may cargo shipment daw. Tapos si Duterte daw  mismo ang nag-check
ng cocaine. Tinikman daw.”

First: I’m not an anti-narcotics agent but I will dare say that unless one is a drug lord or veteran pusher, nobody can tell by just looking at a stuff if it’s cocaine or not. The stuff would even have to be tasted first before it can be determined if it’s indeed cocaine. Trillanes said Barrido SUPPOSEDLY ONLY SAW Duterte check on and taste the stuff.  So it’s both RIDICULOUS and an IMPOSSIBILITY INSIDE AND OUT for Barrido to be able to allegedly tell Trillanes’ camp with certainty that the supposed shipment was cocaine.

Second: If Barrido had indeed stumbled on a drug shipment, she would have called police or any law enforcement officer RIGHT THERE AND THEN. And not WASTE TIME and EFFORT in contacting Trillanes’ office instead, AFTER THE SUPPOSED INCIDENT. Even a HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT KNOWS that senators DO NOT HAVE POLICE POWERS or anything else to do with anti-illegal drug efforts.  Assuming, JUST ASSUMING, that Barrido had indeed seen a supposed drug shipment, she would have been KILLED by the syndicate involved right away or as soon as possible. She would not have been alive to supposedly inform Trillanes’ camp about it

If Trillanes is innocent, then he should have NO PROBLEM doing and explaining all these concerns. If he won’t, or would even hesitate, then he had better have an air-tight explanation on why should anybody still believe anything he’ll say. 30







No comments:

Post a Comment