Saturday, September 21, 2013

DE LIMA'S EXTREME ARROGANCE ON NAPOLES CASE!

It was nothing less than ARROGANCE OF THE HIGHEST ORDER for Justice  Sec. Leila de Lima to tell congressmen that the Office of the Ombudsman should not be pressured into fast-tracking its the investigation into the plunder cases involving the pork barrel scam.

A story in journal.com.ph quoted  De Lima as telling congressmen during the budget hearing for her department: “Hindi natin pwede madaliin iyan.”

First and foremost: WHO does De Lima think she is to dictate to congressmen HOW TO THINK on the pork barrel scam? She may be the Justice secretary but that DOESN’T GIVE HER THE RIGHT to immediately junk as erroneous the congressmen’s hopes on the cases.

As we all know, we are all entitled to our opinions and aspirations, and morally bound to respect those of others as well.

Second: De Lima herself said it will be the Ombudsman who will determine if there is probable cause which would warrant the filing of the cases before the Sandiganbayan.

NOT her or her department.

Therefore, she has NO PROFESSIONAL OR MORAL RIGHT to speak for the Ombudsman on what is proper and improper as far as the investigation into the plunder  cases are concerned.

Unless De Lima has also been appointed as spokesperson for the Ombudsman.

Third: As I had pointed out in an earlier blog, the pork barrel scam has been running in media for the past two months or so. But evidence for the plunder cases submitted by De Lima’s people totaled 175,000 pages.

If she and her people can work that fast to file the plunder cases, WHY CAN’T the Ombudsman be just as speedy in determining who deserves to be sued before the Sandiganbayan??

If De Lima will cite their voluminous evidence as the reason, why doesn’t she detail some of her personnel to the Ombudsman.

She and Ombudsman Conchita Carpio Morales can also request anything from PNoy, since the whole country knows how close they are to him, to speed up the process.

If De Lima doesn’t plan to help fast-track the Ombudsman’s job, then she should just SHUT UP. WE DON/T NEED her views as a gauge of how should we appreciate the Ombudsman’s efforts.   
I repeat, she herself had said it’s now up to the Ombudsman. 30





No comments:

Post a Comment