Saturday, September 7, 2013

PNOY'S DISCRETIONARY FUNDS MUST BE AUDITED, AND DISCLOSED!

Apart from the truth about the Napoles controversy, there’s another equally important issue which the PNoy Government must show and explain to us ordinary Pinoys, PRONTO:

AN AUDIT of PNoy’s MULTI-BILLION DISCRETIONARY FUNDS.

I don’t know if there’s a law or rule which exempts PNoy to come out with an audit or breakdown of how he spends his discretionary funds – social, calamity and intelligence, among others.

But whether he’s exempted or not, we ordinary Pinoys have ALL THE RIGHT TO KNOW where the money was spent or how it’s managed.

Dahil PERA NATIN iyon, mga  kababayan.

Perang galing sa iba’t-ibang klaseng buwis, sa sari-saring binabayad natin sa mga transaksyon natin sa gobyerno lokal man o national, at sa mga pinagkakakitaan ng gobyerno tulad ng Pagcor at PCSO.

Na mga Pilipino rin ang PANGUNAHING manunugal o customer.

So since PNoy’s discretionary funds are NOT HIS PERSONAL MONIES, he has a MORAL OBLIGATION to show or prove to the people that he’s spending these judiciously and NOT FOR HIS OR OTHERS’ PERSONAL GAIN.

His disclosure must be DETAILED AND DOCUMENTED, as in complete with receipts, records, and other proof of where the monies went. Add to all these the JUSTIFICATIONS for having the funds, even if separate monies have been given to government departments for the same purpose.

For example, PNoy has his own calamity fund.

But the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) also has its own calamity fund (in the hundreds of millions or tens of billions if I’m correct).

Now, PNoy, as well as the Office of the President, is NOT DIRECTLY INVOLVED in calamity work like rescue and relief. And as well know by now, HINDI NGA SIYA MAKITA SA ORAS NG KALAMIDAD.

Kaya BAKIT kailangang mayroong sariling calamity fund si PNoy?

I had warned in an earlier blog that the expose on the pork barrel scam could very well be a cover-up for something more corrupt or illegal.


I repeat that warning now, and I mean every letter of it. 30

1 comment: