6 LOOPHOLES IN LACERDIA DENIAL OF PNOY-NAPOLES LUNCH!

I see SIX VERY CRITICAL LOOPHOLES in the denial by Presidential Spokesman Edwin Lacierda of former Sen. Kit Tatad’s newspaper article that PNoy had lunch with Janet Napoles in Malacanang last Aug. 28, when she hasn’t officially surrendered to him yet.

First and foremost: Lacierda DID NOT CATEGORICALLY DENY that Napoles was indeed in Malacanang that day.  The only thing he denied was the supposed lunch between her and PNoy.

Second: Lacierda DID NOT CATEGORICALLY DENY Tatad’s claim that Napoles arrived in Malacanang at 10:30 a,m, that day WITH HIM.

Third: Lunch is the core of the controversy, but Lacierda DID NOT CITE WHERE PNoy had lunch that day and WITH WHOM!

Fourth: Lacierda may have given PNoy’s schedule that day, but he DID NOT ACCOUNT FOR HIS WHEREABOUTS DURING LUNCHTIME.

Fifth: Considering the sensitivity of the issue, Lacierda DID NOT PRESENT EVEN ONE WITNESS who can belie Tatad’s story.

Sixth: Lacierda also DID NOT CATEGORICALLY DENY Tatad’s claim that he and Napoles left Malacanang together at 4:30 p.m. that day.

Even if Lacierda’s denial is as weak as a DYING PERSON, I will not give a categorical assessment of the issue.

Instead, I will appeal to each and everyone who may have accurate information on this controversy to REVEAL IT AT ONCE, whether in person, through media, the Internet or any other means possible.

DON’T take this PNoy-Napoles lunch controversy lightly, people. And I mean every letter of it.

For the simple reason that f it is true, then it’s INDISPUTABLE PROOF that PNoy is LOOKING AFTER Napoles’ welfare and extending to her all the favors he could.

How else will you describe lunch between the President of the country and a fugitive, the supposed MASTERMIND of a P10-billion CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE with our hard-earned taxes as the loot?

If that’s the case, WE SHOULDN’T BE SURPRISED if Napoles would be cleared f everything in the porlk barrel scam,! 30