VALTE INCREASES COVER-UP FEARS ON NAPOLES LIST!

Deputy Presidential Spokesperson Abigail Valte has just given the people more reason to fear a cover-up in the affidavit on alleged ‘pork barrel’ scam participants which suspected brains Janet Napoles had given to Justice Sec. Leila de Lima.

Think about this, guys. Think really hard about this:

In a story inquirer.net, Valte was quoted as saying “as far as we are concerned, nobody else (except De Lima) has the affidavit (which includes the list). She wants us to think that any other affidavit which may suddenly appear is bogus.

Kahit abogado na mismo ni Napoles ang nagkumpirma sa isang balita kahapon sa manilastandardtoday.com na may nauna nang binigay na affidavit si Napoles kay dating Sen. Ping Lacson.

Kahit na di pa ito kumpleto.

Kaya BAKIT PINIPILIT AGAD ni Valte na iyung hawak lamang ni De Lima ang tutoong affidavit? Samantalang HINDI RIN NAMAN NIYA MASABING SINUNGALING ang abogado ni Napoles dahil sa naulat sa manilastandardtoday.

Like De Lima, Valte wants to CONDITION OUR MINDS THIS EARLY that the ONLY TRUTH to the Napoles affidavit is what the Justice Secretary has. And would allege once she reveals the SUPPOSED CONTENTS, a time that ONLY SHE AND GOD KNOWS WHEN!

But as I’ve noted in my preceding blog, WE HAVE NO GUARANTEE that De Lima is NOT YET REMOVING OR ADDING NAMES to the list.

Dahil AYAW NIYA NGA IBULGAR HANGGANG NGAYON, kahit ilang araw na ang nakakaraan mula nang ibigay sa kaniya yung affidavit ni Napoles, kung sinu-sino ang nasa listahan.

At WALA RING PARAAN para makumpirma natin anuman ang sasabihin pa ni De  Lima na kasama sa affidavit kuno.

Dahil sa tagal ng pagipit niya ng nilalaman nito, WALA TAYONG PARAAN para malaman kung IDINAGDAG lamang niya iyung sasabihin niya or may tinanggal siyang ibang detalye galling kay Napoles.

And most of all, think about this:

It’s Napoles’ affidavit, not De Lima’s. De Lima IS NOT THE LAWYER of Napoles. So it’s OUTRIGHT ILLOGICAL AND SUSPICIOUS for De Lima to insist on being the one to divulge the contents of the affidavit, and not Napoles.

Kung ano ang dahilan ni De Lima, kayo na ang magsabim mga suki. 30