DE LIMA ALIBI JUSTIFIES RELEASE OF JANET'S LIST!!

By her own mouth, Justice Sec. Leila de Lima has given the BEST REASON for her to IMMEDIATELY reveal the list of people linked by ‘pork barrel’ scam suspect Janet Lim Napoles to the anomaly.

A story in abs-cbnnews.com said in rejecting calls for her to publicly release the list, De Lima said doing so would cause MAYHEM or CHAOS.

I

big sabihin, sa tingin mismo ni De Lima ay MAS MALAKI pang di hamak ang anomalya kesa mga lumabas na sa media. Dahil HINDI SIYA NAGPAHAYAG ng ganitong takot mula nang mabulgar ang scam.

Ibig sabihin, SAKSAKAN PA NG LAKI ANG NANAKAW na pera ng bayan o di hamak na MAS MARAMI pa ang mga isinangkot ni Napoles, o pareho.

Otherwise, there’s NO SANE REASON TO FEAR CHAOS OR TROUBLE if the scam isn’t much, much worse than what has been uncovered so far and the stolen monies are smaller than  had been reported in media.,

So since it’s OUR MONEY, OUR TAXES AND OTHER PAYMENTS to the government, WE HAVE ALL THE RIGHT TO IMMEDIATELY KNOW what Napoles bared to De Lima.

Para ALAM NATIN KUNG SINU-SINO pa ang dapat nating paimbestigahan o habulin, at kung MAGKANO BA TALAGA, ang NANAKAW sa atin.

Mula mismo sa itinuturong utak ng anomalya, at HINDI KAY DE LIMA LAMANG.

Para MALAMAN NA NATIN ang iba pang BAHAGI NG KUWENTO ng scam, at HINDI yung puro sa gobyerno lamang at sa mga testigong lumantad na.

As I had said in my preceding blog, it is NOT for De  Lima to decide which is important to the case against the scam suspects  because it’s already with the Ombudsaman. And she’s NOT THE OMBUDSMAN!

More importantly, De Lima is NOT THE MEASURE OR GAUGE OF TRUTH in the ‘pork barrel’ scam case.

I’m not a lawyer but I will dare say that there’s no law which provides that whatever the Ombudsman says as the TRUTH is automatically the truth. Anybody correct me if I’m wrong.

Panghulli, WALA RING KARAPATAN si De Lima para maghusga AGAD NA GULO ang mangyayari kapag ikbubulgar na niya ngayon ang nilalaman ng listahan ni Napoles.

HINDI SIYA ang National Security Adviser. Hindi rin nabalita kahit kalian na naging security adviser siya ng kahit sinong mataas na tao o sensitibong tanggapan ng gobyerno o sa pribadong sektor.

HINDI rin naiulat kahit kalian nagnumber one siya sa anumang kurso sa security, o nakatapos man lang ng ganito.

Neither is she an intelligence expert, or has ever been one, since she entered government service during the Arroyo Administration. So she has NO PROFESSIONAL RIGHT to arrogantly prejudge anything when it comes to security.

Unless De Lma is suffering from DELUSIONS.30