MAY ALAM BA Si DE LIMA SA SCAM?

In a story in manilastandardtoday.com, Justice Sec. Leila de Lima was quoted as insisting that: “When I do share with the public the list of Mrs. (Janet) Napoles, I’ll be able to say which ones are true and credible, and which ones are untrue.

I’m not a lawyer but I’ll dare raise this QUESTION: MAY PERSONAL NA ALAM BA si De Lima sa scam?

I cannot imagine HOW can De Lima be 100 percent sure of being able to tell which are true and which are lies in the Napoles list when she finally completes her supposed validation, and share the contents to the public.

If she has NO PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE of the scam, what makes her 100 percent confident that she will find out ALL THE NEEDED INFORMATION to prove BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT that whatever she’ll declare to the public about the list is indeed THE TRUTH?

I’m not a lawyer. But I have read, heard and known of quite a number of cases wherein crucial proof which eventually led to the unexpected verdict was uncovered and presented ONLY DURING TRIAL.

Not during pre-trial inquiries and investigations.

And COMMON SENSE dictates that you can only be 100 percent sure of something if you are personally involved it, either RIGHT FROM THE START or for a long period in whatever capacity.

Or MATAGAL NA MATAGAL mo nang KILALA NG PERSONAL ang mga nagsasagawa ng bagay na iyun na ALAM MO AGAD kung nagsisinungaling sila o hindi.

Naniniwala ako na WALANG PERSONAL na kaalaman si De Lima tungkol sa scam, hanggang sa mabulgar na ito.

Pero WALA pa rin akong nababasa o nadidnig sa TV/radio na matagal nang kilala ng personal ni De Lima sina Napoles at ang mga testigo bago pa nabunyag ang anomalya.

And at this point in time, IT GOES WITHOUT SAYING that the guilty in the Napoles list has already DESTROYED WHATEVER INCRIMINATING EVIDENCE HAD BENE OVERLOOKED BEFORE.

So there’s NO SANE BASIS for De Lima’s arrogance that she’ll be able to tell the truth and the lie in the Napoles list when she finally makes it public.

Then WHY is she withholding the list?

Two possibilities: Either on the ORDERS OF SOMEBODY or for her LUST FOR PUBLICITY. 

                                                                        30