PNOY A VICTIM TOO....GIMME ME A BREAK!.

A story in inquirer.net quoted congressmen-allies of PNoy as saying, in essence, that he’s also a victim in the Mamasapano massacre, was betrayed and therefore should not be among those who should be blamed for it. Oh, really? If that’s the case, then please explain or answer, honorable congressmen, these key issues which the President HAS COLD-HEARTEDLY AND CONVENIENTLY REFUSED TO ANSWER OR IGNORE.:

WHY DID PNOY LIE on national television when he said on national television that the involvement of then suspended PNP chief Alan Purisima in the Mamasapano operation was only until his suspension? Records now show that Purisima was even the first to text PNoy on the day of the Mamasapano operation that I target terrorist Marwan had been killed and the PNP-Special Action Force raiders were already fighting their way out.

Every EDUCATED PERSON knows that when someone is suspended from work he or she SHOULD NOT INTERFERE, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, in any work in the office. But PNoy IGNORED this. He still allowed Purisima’s presence in the Jan. 9 briefing on Mamasapano, and DID NOT SUMMON PNP Officer-in-Charge Deputy Director-General Leonardo Espina to it, as BASIC PROFESSIONAL COURTESY DICTATES.  Please explain these, your honors. What made Mr. Espina so UNTRUSTWORTHY in the eyes of PNoy? Is there any basis or proof that Mr. Espina can’t do what Mr. Purisima can? If it’s the prerogative of PNoy to talk directly to anybody in the PNP anytime, then does it mean that the President has a DICTATORIAL MINDSET that he will do anything he wants without giving a bullshit to even routine acts of respect?

PNoy is now categorically blaming Purisima for letting him down and lying to him on the Mamasapano operation. If he’s sincere in throwing the books on Purisima, then why isn’t PNoy NOT DOING ANYTHING to penalize Purisima  Anybody correct me if I’m wrong but PNoy has not ordered the filing of charges, administrative or otherwise, of Purisima, or the conduct of an official, formal investigation of the former PNP chief.  PNoy has not even directed PNP officials to formally interrogate Purisima for his lies and insubordination.

Lastly, PNoy conducted two briefings in Zamboanga City on the day of the Mamasapano operation as the SAF raiders were being slaughtered in battle. What was tackled in those briefings? To say that PNoy was not informed of the entrapment of the SAF guys would be nothing less than RIDICULOUS AND IMPOSSIBLE. WHY DIDN’T THE PRESIDENT PERSONALLY ORDER MILITARY REINFORCEMENTS on the spot, IMMEDIATELY, for the SAF commandoes?  He had the power to do si, being commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces,

To  move on from the Mamasapano carnage without justice for the SAF 44’s killers, plus P70 billion for their bosses who would not surrender them either, is nothing less than a FREE PASS FOR TERRORISTS WITH A GARGANTUAN BONUS FOR MURDER, which will come form our taxes and other fess to PNoy’s government. 30