HERE'S WHY PNOY SHOULD APOLOGIZE OVER MAMASAPANO!

Putting it simply, WITH OR WITHOUT THE CHAIN OF COMMAND CRAP. here’s why PNoy should apologize, at the very least,  for the Mamasapano massacre. And unless HUMILITY IS NOT in PNoy’s vocabulary and he believes more in ARROGANCE and FOOLISH PRIDE, mLacanang can’t deny this.

PNoy knew that then PNP chief Alan Purisima was already suspended when he allowed him to take charge, UNOFFICIALLY, of the Mamasapano operation. Now, even the semi or unschooled knows that anyone who gets suspended from work DOES NOT, AND SHOULD NOT, HAVE, ANYTHING TO DO with what’s going on or is about to happen or be performed in or by the office.  Still, PNoy IGNORED THIS IN Purisima’s favor.  He even tolerated PURISIMA’S DISCOURTESY of Espina by allowing him to keep the PNP-officer-in-charge in the dark until the operation. This was proven by PNoy’s non-invitation or summon of Espina to the Jan. 9 briefing on the Mamasapano operation in Malacanang.

As we all know, 44 commandoes of the PNP-Special Action Force (SAF) were eventually killed in Mamasapano. It was PNoy who TOLERATED the UNDUE INTERVENTION  of Purisima. In the operation. Purisima SHOULD HAVE BEEN KEPT OUT of the operation, OFFICIALLY OR UNOFFICIALLY, since he was already suspended. So whether or not he indeed disobeyed any of PNoy’s orders on the operation doesn’t really matter,

PNoy even lied ON NATIONAL TELEVISION  in defense of Purisima. He claimed that Purisima’s involvemen in the Mamasapano operaton was only until the then PNP chief was suspended in December. And while he has claimed that Purisima had lied to  him on the Mamasapano operation, neither has he condemned the former PNP chief or ordered any disciplinary action against him..

LYING and  ABUSE OF AUTHORITY, in this case ignoring Purisima’s suspension, is WRONG ANY WAY you put it.  And even if I’m not a lawyer, the  supposed absence of a chain of command does not make these RIGHT AND JUSTIFIED. 30