THE NEVER-ENDING LIE ABOUT CORY AND DEMOCRACY!

A story in inquirer.net quotes Vice-President Jejomar Binay as describing PNoy’s mother Cory as the icon of democracy, in commemoration of her 5^th death anniversary.

AN OUTRIGHT INSULT TO THE MARTYRS OF DEMOCRACY, AND A NEVER-ENDING LIE TO THE FILIPINO PEOPLE.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, especially to the youth:

HISTORY WILL SHOW that Cory openly fought the late President Ferdinand Marcos ONLY WHEN HER HUSBAND Ninoy was murdered IN 1983.

But MORE THAN 10 YEARS before Ninoy’s death,a lot of other people were OPENLY FIGHTING MARCOS. To name a few, former Senators Jose ‘Pepe’ Diokno, Jovito Salonga, Francisco Soc’ Rodrigo and Eva Estrada Kalaw; former Speaker Ramon Mitra Jr, and journalist Joe Burgos.

Plus the tens of thousands of students who bravely held protest rallies against the Marcos regime.

Anybody correct me if I’m wrong but in everything that these people did, Cory was NEVER REPORTTED as an ACTIVE PARTICIPANT OR SUPPORTER. Neither did she denounce, on her own and in any manner whatsoever, the former president.

So HOW CAN CORY BE AN ICON, or be the icon, of Democracy?

And most of all, again as HISTORY WILL SHOW IT, Cory WAS NOT THE ONE who called for ‘people power’ in 1986 which led to the downfall of Marcos.

It was the late Jaime Cardinal Sin, with the all-out support of the late June Keithley and the men and women who joined her in broadcasting the unfolding events then from a radio station which  Marcos forces never found.

‘People power’ began ONLY WHEN then Defense Minister Juan Ponce Enrile, the Reform the Armed Forces Movement (RAM) led by then Army Col. Gringo Honasan  and then Armed Forces Vice Chief of Staff Fidel Ramos broke away From the Marcos Government.

And NOT BECAUSE OF CORY ALONE.

Cory DID NOT EVEN JOIN Enrile, Honasan, Ramos and the millions of Filipinos who trooped to EDSA and risked their lives during ‘people power.’

As we all know, NAGTAGO SI CORY sa kumbento.

I just forgot the religious order  but Cory came out in public ONLY WHEN it was crystal-clear that Marcos had lost.

So again, HOW CAN CORY BE AN ICON OR THE ICON OF PHILIPPINE DEMOCRACY? Or the mother as some other fanatics of the Aquinos insist on?

TIGILAN NAMAN NA NINYO ANG PANLOLOKO SA TAUMBAYAN, LALO PA SA MGA KABATAAN na hindi na inabot ang ‘people power.’ MAGTIRA NAMAN KAYO NG KAHIT KONTING KAHIHIYAN sa sarili ninyo.!30

WALA TAYONG DAPAT IPAGPASALAMAT SA DAP!

LIWANAGIN lang nating mabuti:

Kahit na nakatulong sa tao kuno ang mga proyektong pinondohan ng Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP), WALA TAYONG DAPAT IPAGPASALAMAT kay PNoy o sinuman sa mga kakampi niya sa Senado o sa House of Representatives.

Lalong WALA TAYONG DAPAT TANAWING UTANG NA LOOB sa kanila, o sa sinumang miyembro ng Cabinet o opisya;l ng gobyerno.

Dahil TRABAHO NILA ang TUMULONG sa atin, sa Sambayanan.

HINDI SILA IBINOTO para lamang MAGPASARAP O MAGPASASA SA PERA NG BAYAN, para gawin kung ano lamang ang gusto nila o maisipan nila.

Ganun din sa mga opisyal ng gobyerno na itilalaga ni PNoy.

TUNGKULIN NILA na magpatupad ng mga proyektong magpapagaan sa, at magtataas ng, kalidad ng buhay nating mga mahihirap; na makakabawas sa mga dinaranas nating pasaning bayarin at iba pang sila lamagn ang makakalutas; na makapagtatama sa mali.

At HINDI IYUNG IPINAGPIPILITAN NILA ANG MALI tulad ng ginagawa nila ngayon sa DAP/

Kaya’t WALANG DAPAT MABULAGAN, O MALOKO, ng gobyerno ni PNoy na pasalamat tayo dahil sa DAP at nagkaroon ng mga proyektong napondohan nito at nakatulong kuno sa iba.

Na dapat natin siyang suportahan sa kaniyang pagpupumilit na maip[agpatuloy ito, kahit na itio ay ILEGAL ayon sa Korte Suprema.

At para mga hindi nakakaalam, sa ilalim ng ating batas, ang Korte Supreme ang TANGING MAY KAPANGYARIHAN PARA MAGDESISYON kung ang isang bagay ay LABAG SA BATAS o hindi.

HINDI SI PNOY, O SINUMANG SENADOR O CONGRESSMAN, o opisyal ng gobyerno.

Hindi ako abugado pero buong lakas ng loob kong uulitin na WALANG BATAS na nagpapahintulot na LABAGIN NINUMAN ANG ANUMANG BATAS kung kabutihan naman ng iba ang pakay niya.

Sa mga PATULOY NA MAGPAPALOKO AT MAGPAPAKABULAG kay PNoy at sa mga galamay niya, SIGURADUHIN lang ninyo ang dalawang bagay:

Una: HUWAG KAYONG MAGREREKALMO O AANGAL kapag kalaban na ni PNoy ang lalabag sa batas dahil mayroong gustong matulungan o para sa kabutihan ng nakakarami ang pakay niya.

Manguna rinkayo sa pagtatanggol sa taong iyun, tulad ng ginagawa ninyong pagtatanggol kay PNoy ngayon. Iyun ay kung alam ninyo ang ibig sabihin ng pagiging PAREHAS.

Pangalawa: SIGURADUHIN ninyong HINDI NINYO SISISIHIN ang sinumang kalaban o kinamumuhian ni PNoy sa ibubunga ng susunod na KAPALPAKAN O ILEGAL na gagawin niya, o nang sinumang alipores niya.

Dahil kung hindi, KAAWAAN NAWA NG DIYOS, NG ATING INANG MAHAL NA BIRHEN MARTIA, at ng lahat ng santo at anghel sa langit, ang Pilipinas.30

IMPEACH PNOY RAPS TESTAMENT TO TRUTH!

A story in inquire.net says an impeachment complaint against PNoy  over the  Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP), has been filed before the House of Representatives Secretary General’s office.

Whether or not the complaint prospers, (personally I don’t believe it would), the impeachment complaint is a TRIUMPH OF, and TESTAMENT to the TRUTH.

The TRUTH that PNoy Is NOT AS POPULAR as surveys of the Social Weather Stations (SWS) and Pulse Asia project him to be.

A total OF 28 PEOPLE, almost all of whom REPRESENTED VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS signed the impeachment complaint.

Among them are Bagong Alyansa Makabayan Secretary General Renato Reyes Jr.; Confederation for Unity, Recognition and Advancement of Government Employees (Courage) President Ferdinand Gaite; Volunteers Against Crime and Corruption (VACC) President Dante Jimenez; Citizens Crime Watch President Atty. Jose Malvar Villegas; Retired archbishop Oscar Cruz; United Church of Christ in the Philippines Bishop Emergencio  Padillo and Iglesia Filipina Independentia Bishop Joselito Cruz.

Check out the complete list in the inquirer.net story.

Now, think about these: These complainants HAVE NAMES AND FACES. And they came out in THE OPEN with their dislike for PNoy.

And even if they do not represent the sentiments of all their members, which will be the likely defense of Malacanang, neither has there been any disclaimer or statement from majority of their members that they speak only for themselves.

UNLIKE the supposed respondents in SWS and Pulse Asia surveys who have NEVER BEEN NAMED OR IDENTIFIED by their professional or social status. Supposed respondents who are represented ONLY BY NUMBERS.

ALIN NGAYON ANG MAS KAPANI-PANIWALA?

If SWS and Pulse Asia will insist on the continued popularity of PNoy, then they had better make public the names and personal details of their supposed respondents and a detailed explanation of their conclusion..

Kung ayaw nila, MAGPAKATUTOO NA LANG SILA! 30

COLOMA FOOLING THE PEOPLE ON PNOY IMPEACHMENT!

A story in inquirer.net quoted Communications Secretary Herminio Coloma Jr. as saying that an impeachment complaint against PNoy based on the unconstitutionality of the Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP) is premature since the issue is still under reconsideration by the Supreme Court.

My take: STUPIDITY OR DECEPTION, OR BOTH, AT ITS FINEST.

The Supreme Court has already decided that the DAP was unconstitutional, or ILLEGAL.

ANYONE who had been hurt, PHYSICALLY OR IN ANY OTHER WAY, by an illegal act has ALL THE RIGHT TO COMPLAIN against the one (s) who committed the deed, IMMEDIATELY.      .

Especially if the act has been ruled on as ILLEGAL by a competent authority, which in the case of the DAP was nothing less than the Supreme Court.

The HIGHEST COURT of the land, the FINAL ARBITER in all legal matters.

To give you an idea, boys and girls, if your auditor tells you after conducting his or her job that your cashier has been stealing from your earnings, you don’t need to wait for anything if you want to file a complaint at once.

Even if I’m not a lawyer I will dare say that an appeal or motion for reconsideration DOES NOT BAR ANYONE from doing anything related to the decision on a case.

An impeachment complaint against PNoy would be premature only if the Supreme Court has not decided yet on the constitutionality of the DAP.

But a decision, a UNANIMOUS ruling, has already been made.

Kaya ISANG DESPERADONG PANLOLOKO, O KABOBOHAN, lamang ni Coloma ang deklarasyon niyang premature o hilaw ang anumang impeachment complaint na isasampa laban kay PNoy dahil sa DAP.

MALINAW PA SA SIKAT NG ARAW na gusto lamang ni Colona na MAPIGILAN ang pagsasampa ng impeachment, lalo pa kung HINDI LAMANG ISA O DALAWA ANG MGA ITO.

Dahil magiging KAHIYA-HIYA SI PNoy, hindi lamang sa Sambayanang Pilipino kundi sa buong mundo. Sapagkat magiging EBIDENSIYA IYUN na HINDI NA KASING–POPULAR si PNoy tulad ng  sinasabi nila.

At para sa  mga hindi nakakaalam:

In the event that the Supreme Court reverses its ruling and declares the DAP as constitutional or legal, then the impeachment raps against PNoy will be null and void.

But until that happens, any and all impeachment complaints against PNoy on the illegality of the DAP is TIMELY, LEGAL and RIPE. 30

VALTE'S TURN TO FOOL THE PEOPLE!

Si Deputy presidential spokesperson Abigail Valte naman ang NANLOLOKO sa taumbayan ngayon sa illegal na Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP).

 A story in gmanews.tv quoted Deputy presidential spokesperson Abigail Valte a as saying that officials involved in the DAP are innocent until proven guilty,
and will therefore stay at their posts.

NO LESS than the Supreme Court, the HIGHEST COURT in the country, has ruled that the DAP was a VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION.

And Malacanang DID NOT, and has not claimed, that the SC was wrong. 

The DAP had ALREADY BEEN IMPLEMENTED.

The evidence: Documents of some of the DAP funds with details and the SIGNATURE AND APPROVAL of PNOy has been out in media. Malacanang has NOT DENIED THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE DOCUMENTS.

Plus, among others, the ADMISSION AND DEFENSE of PNoy of the DAP and of Budget Sec. Butch Abad of having MASTERMINDED the DAP, WITH THE SUPPOSED APPROVAL OF PNOY.

Kaya anong IINNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY pa ang sinasabi ni Valte, sa kabila ng lahat ng ito?

May mga dokumento, pagamin sina PNoy at Abad at desisyon ang Korte  Suprema   pero gusto pa TAYONG GAWING TANGA NI VALTE na inosente pa rin ang mga sangkot sa DAP hanggang sa mapatunayang guilty.

I repeat, the VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION has been done and the key players, PNoy and Abad, have been proven as having been key players in it.

Kung mayroon pang mga dapat patunayan, Ito ay kung SINU-SINO PA ang NAGPATAKBO sa DAP, MAGKANO ang tutoo at eksaktong halaga ng salapi ng taumbayan ang napunta dito at SAAN NAPUNTA ang pera?

Pro-people projects? RECORDS, DOCUMENTS and other PHYSICAL PROOF please, for public scrutiny and validation.

At kung hindi aallisin sa puwesto si Abad a rang sinupamang sangkot sa DAP, WALA TAYONG KASEGURUHAN, MGA KABABAYAN, na HINDI nila SUSUNUGIN O PIUPUNITIN ang anumang ebidensiya na maaaring magdiin sa kanla sa DAP.

TAYONG SAMBAYANAN ang patuloy na MAGDURUSA. 30

DON'T BE FOOLED BY MALACANANG ON DAP!

Since the ILLEGALITY of the Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP) and PNoy’s LIABILITY for it is already being SUPPRESSED in media, let’s NOT FORGET THE FOLLOWING:

PNOY VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, THE SUPREME LAW of the country, when he approved the DAP.

PNoy and his boys DID NOT REJECT the Supreme Court decision outlawing the DAP. Neither have they presented indisputable proof to the contrary, that the DAP was legal.

There is NO LAW that says being the President, PNoy is EXEMPTED FROM VIOLATING THE CONSTITUTION. Neither is there any law which says PNOY IS ABOVE THE LAW.

We are a DEMOCRACY, NOT A DICTATORSHIP, wherein the head of State is the law.

If we let PNoy, and DAP brains Budget Sec. Butch Abad, get away with this SHAMELESS VIOLATION AND DISREGARD of the Constitution, NOTHING WILL STOP THEM from doing something MORE DEVILISH than the DAP.

PNoy KNEW AS EARLY AS 2008, when he was still a senator, that the DAP was illegal. He even authored Senate Bill 3121 entitled “The Budget Impoundment Control Act” which had wanted to bar then President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo from assuming Congress’ power of the purse.

HE DID EXACTLY what he had wanted to outlaw.

Copies and details of DAP documents bearing PNoy’s signature and approval have come out in media, and Malacanang has NOT DENIED THEIR AUTHETICITY.

So PNoy CAN’T CLAIM IGNORANCE of the ILLEGALITY OF THE DAP. And even if he does, IGNORANCE OF THE LAW DOES NOT EXCUSE ANYONE FROM PENALTY.

THERE IS NO LAW which says anyone can do anything ILLEGAL as long as his or her purpose is good.

Except for the Doppler weather equipment which was installed by PAGASA, PNoy and his spokespersons HAVE NOT IDENTIFIED EVEN ONE SUPPOSED PROJECT on which DAP funds were spent!

Kaya’t ang pagpupumilit ng Malacanang na walang masama sa DAP dahil ginamit ito kuno sa mga proyektong nakatulong sa Sambayanan ay LANTARAN AT SUKDULAN NA PANLOLOKO sa atin.

Dahil SAGAD-SAGARAN na ang KAYABANGAN AT KAAROGANTEHAN ng PNoy Government sa PAGIILUSYON NA TANGA TAYO AT UTU-UTONG MANININWALA  AGAD SA ANUMANG SABIHIN NILA.

Join me boys and girls in shouting, to the world, that we Filipinos are NOT A BUNCH OF IDIOTS AND SUCKERS! 30

MOTHER OF ALL LIES OF PNOY GOV'T!

A story in inquirer.net quoted Communications Secretary Herminio Coloma Jr. as saying Wala po kaming ginawang kasalanan hinggil dito (We did nothing wrong here)” in reaction to the unconstitutionality of the Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP).

Even if I’m not a lawyer, I will dare say this: SUKDULANG PANLOLOKO AT KASINUNGALINGAN NA ITO NG MALACANANG. TUNAY NA WALA NANG MAS KAKAPALPA SA MUKHA NG MGA ITO.

The provisions against DAP HAVE BEEN IN THE CONSTITUTION since the so-called ‘Cory Constitution’ in 1987, or 27 LONGYEARS AGO.. These provisions WERE NOT INSERTED in the Constitution ONLY AFTER THE DAP STARTED.

Therefore, the DAP HAD BEEN ILLEGAL ALL ALONG. And PNoy’s Administration HAD VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION from 2011, when the DAP was created, until 2013.

Kaya PAANO MANGYAYARI NA WALANG MALING GINAWA ANG GOBYERNO NI PNOY SA PAGLABAG NILA SA CONSTITUTION dahil sa DAP?  

Kahit na di ako abugado, pupusta ako ng piso manalo isang milyon,HINDI EXEMPTED ang Presidente ng PIlipinas sa paglabag sa Constitution.  At lalong WALANG BATAS na nagsasabing basta ang Presidente o ang kaniyang gobyerno ang  lalabag sa Constitution ay WALANG MALI.

That’s exactly why ONE OF THE GROUNDS FOR IMPEACHMENT of the President is CULPABLE VIOLATION of the Constitution. And for those who missed the news, documents show that PNoy APPROVED the releases of DAP funds.

Malacanang also justifies the DAP by claiming that the funds had been used purportedly for projects that have benefitted the people.

So para pala sa PNoy Admininstration, basta’t para sa kabutihan kuno ay OKAY LANG NA LABAGIN ANG BATAS. Kung ganun,IABOLISH NA LANG ANG CONSTITUTION  at gawing LEGAL ANG PAGNANAKAW o ang PAKIKIALAM NG PONDO NG BAYAN KAHITLABAG SA MGA REGULASYON.

I was also told that some defenders of PNoy are comparing him to the legendary Robin Hood because it was supposedly the masses or the poor who benefitted from DAP funds.

The BIG DIFFERENCE is Robin Hood stole from the ruch and gave the loot to the poor.  IN the case of DAP, it’s the MONEY OF POOR PEOPLE LIKE US which was stolen.

What’s happening now is Coloma, Presidential Spokesman Edwin Lacierda and other Malacanang mouthpieces and allies are DESPERATELY TRYING TO CONDITION OUR MINDS THAT THEY HAVE DONE NOTHING UNLAWFUL EVEN IF THE DAP HAS BEEN DECLARED UNCONSTITUTIONAL

In mass communications, there is what we call the Reinforcement Theory. – Keep on saying something over and over again and it will be perceived as the truth.

That is what PNoy’s Government is doing now.

 Sa mga patuloy na manininwala at susuporta sa PNoy Government: HUWAG KAYONG AANGAL AT MANINISI NG IBA KAPAG LALONG HUMIRAP ANG BUHAY, AT DUMAI ANG NAKAWAN SA GBYERNO.  

At huwag din kayong magugulat kapag ang susunod na kalamidad na tatamsa sa ating bansa ay MAS MASAHGL PA SA BAGYONG ‘YOLANDA,’ bilang parusa ng Diyos sa ating bansa..