Ganito tayo NILOLOKO ni PNoy pagdating sa
pagkakasangkot umano ni Budget Sec. Butch Abad sa ‘pork barrel’ scam:
PNoy is insisting that Abad is innocent until proven
guilty.
Tulad ng pinaliwanag ko sa aking nakaraang blog,
MALINAW sa ating batas na HUSGADO LAMANG ang may karapatang magdeklara kung
guilty o inosente ang isang akusado.
Pero WALANG ISINAMPA, at WALANG SENYALES na balak
magsampa ninuman sa gobyerno, ng kaso laban kay Abad matapos siyang DERECHAHANG
TUKUYIN ni suspected ‘pork barrel’ scam mastermind Janet Napoles bilang teacher
nito sa anomalya.
So since there’s no case against Abad, NO COURT CAN
DECIDE on whether he is indeed guilty based on Napoles’ claims.
Kaya TALAGANG MAGMUMUKHANG INOSENTE si Abad.
That’s why PNoy is so confident in saying that Abad
in innocent until proven guilty, because WITHOUT A CASE, NO COURT
Ganiyan KAGARAPAL ang PANLOLOKO na ginagawa sa atin
ni PNoy..
I AM NOT PREJUDGING ABAD, let that be for the record.
But if he is as clean and innocent as PNoy projects him to be, WHY WON’T any
government agency or official question or investigate him?
WHY WON’T PNOY order the investigation of Abad? Or
why doesn’t Abad submit himself to a probe?
Kung WALANG DAPAT ITAGO O KATAKUTAN si Abad na
mabisto o mabulgar, WALANG DAHILAN para huwag siyang paimbestiga. Iyon ang
PINAKAMABILIS na paraan para malinis niya ang kaniyang pangalan.
Sinumang inosente ang isangkot sa anomalyang
kasing-laki ng ‘pork barrel’ scam ay AGAD NA SUSUNGGABAN ang anumang pagkakataon
para mapatunayan niyang wala siyang kasalanan.
Think about this, boys and girls. Think very, very
hard about this all of you, especially you fanatics of PNoy. 30.
No comments:
Post a Comment