HARI NG MGA AROGANTE SI BRIILLANTES!

Talaga palang HARI NG MGA AROGANTE at MAYAYABANG si Comelec Chairman Sixto Brilantes.

A story in inquirer.net  quoted Brillanted as saying that the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) “should not [tell us what to do]. They should take care of the Church, not the elections. Our job is elections. Their job is religion”

Una: Botante rin ang mga kasapi ng CBCP. Kasama ang  mga boto nila, na DAPAT AY BINILANG MUNA LAHAT ng Comelec pagkatapos ng botohan. 

Bago nagproklama si Brillantes ng mga nanalo kahit WALA PA SA KALAHATI ang mga nabibilang na boto.

So the CBCP has ALL THE MORAL AND LEGAL RIGHT to ask questions or make suggestions to help ENSURE that their ballots were not thrown into the garbage can.

Or simply used as props for what is now a STATISTICALLY, LEGALLY AND MORALLY QUESTIONABLE RESULT of the polls.

(Remember the 60-30-10 pattern in some election returns in favor of Team PNoy senatorial bets which had been detected by some information technology experts?  

(And the press statement by renowned election lawyer Romulo Macalintal that the Supreme Court itself had ruled that no proclamation can be made until the canvassing of all election returns has been finished)

Second: The Philippines is a democratic country.. In any democratic country, the government is of the people, by the people and for the people.

So not just the CBCP but every Filipino has the right to question the Comelec anytime on anything suspicious or out of the ordinary.

I’m not a lawyer but I will dare say that there’s no law which exempts the Comelec from suggestions or questions by ordinary citizens on the conduct and integrity/legality of its actions.

Maliban na lang kung para kay Brilantes ay DIKTADURYA O KOMUINISTA na ang gobyerno natin.

Kung saan walang sinumang puwedeng bumatikos o magmungkahi ng anuman sa gobyerno ang snuman. At ang gobyerno ay HINDI NAGKAKAMALI KAILANMAN.

Third: Brillantes complained that he already admitted discrepancies in the random manual audit “but now I’m the one being blamed.”

Comelec was the one who conducted and supervised EVERYTHING during the elections. So it’s but natural for Brillantes to be blamed since he is the head of Comelec.

Unless Brillantes does not know the meaning of COMMAND RESPONSIBILITY. 

Fourth:  PNoy himself had declared in his first day as president that we the people are his bosses.  So does that apply only to PNoy, and not to Brillantes?

Ano anjg ibig palabasin ni Brillantes, pagdating sa eleksiyon, SIYA ANG BOSS NATIN?

Huwag tayong MAGPALOKO o MAGING BULAG, mga kababayan.  HINDI PA TAYO NAKASISIGURO na malinis ang nakaraang halalan.30

GDP GROWTH DOUBTFUL, BASELESS!

The claim by the Aquino Government that the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) expanded by 7.8 percent in the first quarter of 2013 is both HIGHLY DOUBTFUL and TOTALLY BASELESS..

First of all, the supposed growth was reported by the National Statistics Coordination Board (NSCB).

Bukod sa katotohanang natural na hindi magsasabi ng pangit ang NCSB dahil bahagi din ito ng Gobyernong Aquino, WALANG ANUMANG DETALYE ang diumano’y GDP growth na pinagmalaki pa ni Deputy Presidential Spokesperson Abigail Valte.

Kaya’t paano maniniwala ng basta-basta ang sinuman?  

Valte claimed that growth was felt in almost all sectors, especially in manufacturing which expanded by 9.7 percent.

But she DID NOT PRESENT any specific proof of this supposed growth – how many new jobs were created and in what companies, how many new businesses opened and who and where are these, what companies in particular experienced growth and by how much.

As I’ve said before, ANYONE of us can claim something now and just present numbers as supposed proof.

Valte’s claim that expanded government spending in public construction was also a key in the GDP growth is NOTHING TO BE PROUD OF.

Dapat lamang gastusan ng todo ng kahit na sinong administrasyon ang mga pangangailangan ng taumbayan, lalo na sa imprastraktura. Kaya HINDI MAKATARUNGANG ipagmalaki ito ni Valte.

TUNGKULIN ITO, HINDI ACCOMPLISHMENT ng gobyerno.  

The same applies to what Valte said was the supposed four-fold increase in the budget of the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program, or the conditional cast transfer (CCT) project.

At HUWAG NATING KALIMUITAN na hanggang ngayon, WALANG NILALABAS NA DETALYADONG KUWENTA ang gobyerno kung saan na napunta ang bilyun-bilyong pera ng CCT.

Wala tayong kasiguruhan na walang ninanakaw sa mga ito,

It was also IRRESPONSIBLE for Valte to describe claim that the elections showed that the public still has confidence in PNoy.

IMPOSIBLE namang HINDI ALAM o HINDI NABABASA ni Valte ang dumaraming tanong at pagdududa sa naging pagpapatakbo at ng naging resulta ng nakaraang halalan.

Hintayin muna niyang mapatunayang talagang walang naging dayaan noong eleksyon bago niya ipagmalaki na may kumpiyansa pa ang sambayanan kay PNoy.  30

SOMETHING'S FISHY WITH TAIWAN CRISIS HANDLING

There is something suspicious, if not fishy, in the way the government is handling the Taiwan crisis.

First: More than two weeks after the May 9 incident, the Aquino Government has yet to present to the public the Coast Guard personnel involved in the incident.

We, the people, don’t know who they are. Even the media can’t interview them. They’re the ones who were there but we can’t get the story straight from their mouths.  

The best people who can prove that our Coast Guard personnel acted only in self-defense, as claimed by the government, are the Coast Guard guys themselves.

Not Malacanang, not Justice Sec Leila de Lima. But both don’t seem to give a damn about it. Even if the Coast Guard personnel’s testimonies can fast-track the peaceful resolution of the crisis.

Second: Up to now, the Aquino Government has not yet released the supposed video tape taken by the Coast Guard personnel which can prove they opened fire only in self-defense.

Anybody who wants to prove his or her innocence will immediately grab every opportunity to do so.  Why, then, is the government withholding the tape? Not only to us but to the Taiwanese Government as well?

MERON BANG DAPAT ITAGO, O REMEDYUHAN MUJNA?

Third: For the second time in a row, claims by Manila Economic and Cultural Office Chairman Amadeo Perez were belied by the government even if he’s the government representative in Taiwan .

Newspaper reports the other day quoted Mr. Perez as saying that Taiwan has set new conditions in handling the investigation. But De Lima later said there’s none.

Prior to this, Perez was quoted in media early in the crisis as saying that the Philippine Government has promised a joint investigation into the killing.

But Malacanang said this was not true. ANO BA ANG TUTOO?.

Unless the Aquino Government will be totally transparent, and I mean  immediately, the handling of the Taiwan crisis will never be 100 percent credible.

REGARDLESS of what  they’ll  report as the outcome.

For  the sake of our countrymen in Taiwan,, especially the OFWs, the truth had better come out once and for all. If not, somebody had better name whoever is to blame should our people be further subjected to harm and indignities in Taiwan. 30  

BLAME DE LIMA IF TAIWAN CRISIS WORSENS!

If the Taiwan crisis goes out of control, and I mean leads to a break in diplomatic ties or something to that effect, BLAME Justice Sec. Leila de Lima for her TOTAL INCOMPETENCE AND ARROGANCE m handling the issue.

Whether we admit it or not, Taiwan has been showing a lot more sincerity and fairness in trying to prove their case and in resolving the issue amicably.

A story in inquirer.net says according to Taiwan’s Fisheries Agency, the voyage data recorder of the fishing boat Guang Ta Hsin 28 showed it had been fishing within Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone when it was fired upon by a Philippine Coast Guard patrol.

This follows a press conference by Taiwanese investigators who revealed, among others, the number and position of bullet holes on the Guang Ta Hsin which contradict earlier reports that it had tried to ram the coast guard patrol.

But De Lima, who controls the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) which is looking into the incident, WOULD NOT AUTHORIZE THE RELEASE of any purported findings so far UNTIL THE PROBE IS COMPLETE.

Which ONLY GOD KNOWS WHEN! So how the hell do you expect to appease Taiwan?

Taiwan has been asking for a joint investigation into the incident.

De Lima flatly rejected this. However, she has also announced that the Philippines would make “coordinated efforts” with Taiwan in probing the shooting.

WHEN YOU LOOK INTO SOMETHING, YOU’RE INVESTIGATING IT. Official or unofficial, IT’S AN INVESTIGATION and even a high school kid knows this.

Gusto pang gawing TANGA ni De Lima ang taumbayan.

De Lima has also said an NBI team would fly to Taiwan to examine the Guang Ta Hsin and question the rest of the crew.survivors. But again, she DID NOT SAY WHEN.

Ang Taiwan, AGAD NA NAGPADALA ng mga imbestigador dito. Nakapag-imbestiga na, inihayag na ang kanilang findings at nakabalik na sa kanilang bansa.  Si De Lima, MAGPAPADALA PA LANG. 

Kayo na ang magsabi, mga kababayan: ANONG KLASENG SISTEMA, ANONG KLASENG UTAK meron si De Lima? At uulitin ko, PAANO KAKALMA ang Taiwan kung ganito ang ginagawa ng gobyerno natin?

Our countrymen -- the OFWs in Taiwan and the businessmen here who have lost Taiwanese clients or guests -- have been suffering from the anger of the Taiwanese.

Anger which SHOULD NOT HAVE RAGED in the first place had WE BEEN MORE TRANSPARENT, and the crisis HANDLED CORRECTLY by TRULY COMPETENT PEOPLE.

And ojur dear President PNoy is ALLOWING DE  LIMA’S  INCOMPETENCE TO CONTINUE. 30

COMELEC BEST PROOF OF HYPOCRISY, LAWLESSNESS

Summing it all up, the Commission on Elections (Comelec) has just proven itself as the BEST PROOF OF HYPOCRISY AND LAWLESSNESS of the PNoy Government.

Totally ignoring legal questions on its PREMATURE PROCLAMATIONS, the Comelec declared the final three winners in the senatorial elections.

Even though the canvass of the votes cast has NOT BEEN COMPLETED, as CLEARLY MANDATED by the Supreme Court and Section 20 of Republic Act No. 9369, or the Amended Automated Election System Law of 2007.

LAWLESSNESS because as I had cited in a previous blog, renowned election lawyer Romulo Macalintal noted that in the case of Mutuc vs Comelec, the Supreme Court decided that an incomplete canvass is illegal and cannot be the basis of a subsequent proclamation,

And that “without including the (uncounted) votes in the proclamation is disrespectful of the returns and in effect disenfranchise the voters.”

The election watchdog Legal Network for Truthful Elections (Lente) poll pointed out that Section 20 provides that the certificate of canvass, which is to be considered as official election results and which will be used as the basis for the proclamation of a winning candidate, should only be produced upon completion of the canvass.

Comelec Chairman Sixto Brillantes and his boys DID NOT, AND HAVE NOT BOTHERED, to answer these issues. Nor have they cited any LEGAL JUSTIFICATION for their action up to now.

The Comelec issued a resolution on May 16 allowing the use of grouped canvass reports for its premature proclamation of wining senators.

But Macalintal under the law, Comelec resolutions take effect only seven days after their publication. And it’s been only three days since that resolution was issued.

LUBUSANG BINALE-WALA ni Brillantes at ng Comelec ang BATAS. KUNG ANO ANG GUSTO NILA (o ng kung sinumang panginoon nila), GINAWA NILA.

If this isn’t LAWLESSNESS, I would welcome any DETAILED rebuttal.

And I say HYPOCRISY because PNoy, and his mouthpieces in Malacanang, HAVE NOT QUESTIONED the premature proclamations of the winning senators.

BIGLANG NAGING BULAG AT BINGI si PNoy, ang spokesman niyang si Edwin Lacierda at alalay nitong si Abigail Valte, si Ricky Carandang at lahat ng kanilang mga katribo.

LANTARANG PAGBALE-WALA na sa batas ang ginawa ng Comelec.

Pero kapag kalaban, LAHAT SILA, PATI NA MGA KAKAMPI NILANG SENADOR AT CONGRESSMAN, ay may KANIYA-KANIYANG SINASABI.

Invoking PNoy’s totally abused ‘tuwid na daan’ cliché to the max.

‘Tuwid na daan’ my ass. KAPAL NG MUKHA TO THE MAX, and I mean every letter \of it.

God have mercy on our country.  30

PAMBABASTOS NG COMELEC SA SC, 39-M BOTANTE, ANG ISYU

Para MALIWANAGAN  ang mga nabubulagan at WALA NANG MALOKO PA ang Commission on Elections (Comelec), lalo na ang chairman nitong si Sixto Brillantes:

Ang PAGBALEWALA ng Comelec sa Korte Suprema,  PAMBABASTOS sa halos 39 NA MILYONG BOTANTE na hindi ba nabibilang ang mga boto at PUWERSAHANG PAGPANALO ng mga Team Pnoy candidates ang TUNAY NA ISYU sa ginagawang premature na proklamasyon ng mgananalong senador.

And  not just the seemingly insurmountable lead of the winning candidates, which Brillantes is DESPERATELY TRYING TO BRAINWASH the people with.

In an inquirer.net story,prominent election lawyer Romulo Macalintal said Grace Poe, Loren Legarda, Alan Peter Cayetano, Chiz Escudero, Nancy Binay and Sonny Angara were proclaimed with only 72 of the 304 certificates of canvass, or just a little more than 13 million votes out of the 52 million registered voters, officially tabulated by Comelec.

Sa mga PANATIKO mg Gobyernong PNoy:

Huwag ninyong sabihin na kayo ay papayag at hindi poprotesta kapag ang kalaban ninyo sa isang contest ay idedeklara nang panalo ng mga judge KAHIT NA WALA PA SA KALAHATI ANG NABIBILANG NA BOTO.

I also dare PNoy’s  followers to PUBLICLY DECLARE that they  would not say a word and just keep quiet if, for example, Kris Aquino  loses to her rival in the 2016 elections even though their votes have not been counted yet.

As in, BABASTUSIN DIN KAYO tulad ng GINAGAWA ng Comelec ngayon.

If anyone will have the nerve to say yes, be sure to send me your REAL PHOTO, NAME AND ADDRESS OR LOCATION (I will verify it) so that I can come out with it in my blog and FB groups.

So that I will have physical proof if you suddenly EAT YOUR WORD when the time comes.

At paano puwersahang pinanalo ang mga Team PNoy candidates?

Up to now, Brillantes HAS NOT DISPUTED tMacalintal’s argument that in the case of Mutuc vs Comelec, the Supreme Court decided that an incomplete canvass is illegal and cannot be the basis of a subsequent proclamation.

And that “without including the (uncounted) votes in the proclamation is disrespectful of the returns and in effect disenfranchise the voters.”

Brillantes HAS YET TO PRESENT any law or ruling which justifies the premature proclamations despite the Supreme Court decisions. But he SHAMELESSLY goes on with it.

With only the Comelec’s projections as his basis. Even Nostradamus didn’t dare pull that kind of acr.

KUNG HINDI TAYO MAGKAKAISA, huwag tayong magulat kung sa 2016 ay MAGDEKLARA na agad ng mga nanalong senador si Briullantes  kahit na 10 porsiyento pa lamang ng mga boto ang nabibilang ng Comelec.

If anyone can send me any law or legal justification on the PREMATURE PROCLAMATION of winning senators, despite the Supreme Court decision, I will come out with it. Promise.

Huwag n’yo lang akong tangkaing lokohin dahil ikokonsulta ko sa isang doctor of laws na may opisina sa Maikati ang anumang ipapadala ninyo.

Kung wala namang makapagpapadala, pero pilit na ipagtatanggol si Brillantes, siguraduhin lang na agad siyang magpapatingin sa psychiatrist, bago maging huli ang lahat. 30

GARAPALANG KAWALANGHIYAAN NG COMELEC!

GARAPALANG KAWAL;ANGHIYAAN na ang ginagawang pagproklama ng Comelec ng mga nanalong senador.

After the Comelec proclaimed three more winning senators earlier, Comelec chairman Sixto Brillantes Jr.said their basis is ”grouped canvass reports … to project whether the [final results] will be affected or not [by the remaining untransmitted certificates of canvass,].”

IPAAN0 NASIGURADO ni Brillantes na ang humigit kumulang na 11 MILYON pang boto na HINDI PA NABIBILANG ay HINDI MAKAKAAPEKTO sa resulta? ANO ANG GAGAWIN ng Comelec kung ang KARAMIHAN sa 11 milyong boto ay para sa mga kandidato ng UNA?

Has Brillantes SEEN THE UNCANVASSED VOTES IN ADVANCE?  What makes him 100 PERCENT SURE of Comelec’s projection?

Does Brillantes already know what these contain? If he will say yes, how the hell did that happen? If he will say no, what is his SCIENTIFIC and LOGICAL basis?  Is he A DESCENDANT OF NOSTRADAMUS that he can PREDICT WITH CERTAINTY SOMETHING WHICH HE HAS NOT SEEN?

Kung susundin natin ang takbo ng utak ni Brillantes, ang pagproklama pala ng Comelec ng mga nanalong kandidato ngayon ay BASE NA LAMANG SA OPINYON NILA.

At hindi sa KABUUANG BILANG ng mga boto.

Which was decided on by NO LESS than the Supreme Court in the case Mutuc vs Comelec.

Kung hindi pa rin WALANGHIYAAN ang tawag dito, siguruhin lang ng kokontra na may detalye at basehan siyang ilalagay

Renowned election lawyer Romulo Macalintal HAD earlier quoted portions of the Supreme Court decision which said an incomplete canvass is illegal and cannot be the basis of a subsequent proclamation, and that “without including the (uncounted) votes in the proclamation is disrespectful of the returns and in effect disenfranchise the voters.”

As of this hour, Brillantes HAS NOT DISPUTED THE ACCURACY OR CORRECTNESS of what Macalintal had revealed. He has also NOT CITED ANY LAW or Supreme Court decision which justifies the QUESTIONABLE proclamations

Kumontra na ang gustong kumontra.

Kung  HINDI TAYO MAGKAKAISA AT  MAGIIINGAY sa ganitong klaseng KAWALANGHIYAAN  walang iiyak, walang magrereklamo, kung MAS MALA-DEMONYONG  KATARANTADUHAN na ang gawin sa ati  sa susunod.

God have mercy on our country. Spare us, we beg you,  FROM LIVING HELL 30

  

PROCLAMATION OF 6 SENATORS HIGHLY QUESTIONABLE!

The proclamation of the six leading senatorial candidates is now HIGHLY QUESTIONABLE.

Renowned election lawyer Romulo Macalintal said under the rules, the canvass of votes should be completed first “as basis of such proclamation.”

Macalintal even cited the Supreme Court decision in the case of Mutuc vs. Comelec which stated that an incomplete canvass is illegal and cannot be the basis of a subsequent proclamation, and that “without including the (uncounted) votes in the proclamation is disrespectful of the returns and in effect disenfranchise the voters.”

Take note, ladies and gentlemen:

To all these, Comelec Chairman Sixto Brillantes can only reply: “Pwede naman mag project . . . If the results cannot be adversely affected. Pwede na mag proclaim.”

Ngayon, SINO ang mas dapat nating pakinggan –si Tatang Sixto o ang Korte Suprema?

Let’s not forget, guys, the Supreme Court is the FINAL JUDGE when it comes to questions of law. NOT JUST ELECTION LAWS but ALL THE LAWS of the country.

So Brillantes had better have an AIR-TIGHT and ROCK-SOLID proof that he did not IGNORE AND VIOLATE the Supreme Court ruling in proclaiming the six leading senatorial bets,

He had also better have a MORALLY-CONVINCING justification for doing so.

The senators-elect will assume office ONLY ON JUNE 30. That’s still 44 DAYS AWAY, more than enough time for the Comelec to wait for all the election returns.

If Brillantes will say there is a danger that NOT ALL the returns will  be in before June 30, he had better have a DETAILED EXPLANATION and PHYSICAL BASIS for it..

Kung walang magiging MAKATWIRANG PALIWANAG si Brillantes sa lahat ng ito, NASISIRAAN NA NG BAIT ang patuloy na maniniwala sa kaniiya, at sa Comelec.30

SAKSAKAN NG YABANG, AROGANTE SI TATANG SIXTO!

SAKSAKAN NAMAN NG YABANG at AROGANTE si Commission on Elections (Comelec) chairman Sixto Brillantes Jr.

The Parish Pastoral Council for Responsible Voting (PPCRV) and the Kapisanan ng mga Brodkaster ng Pilipinas (KBP) had requested for copies of manually uploaded election returns which remain unaccounted for.

But Instead of immediately providing the returns, Brillantes was quoted in an inquirer.net story as ARROGANTLY replying: “Since when is a citizens’ arm entitled to so many things?”

I say, SINCE WHEN has it been WRONG for accredited ‘quick count’ groups to informally request for election returns for them to deserve the INSULT and RUDENESS of TATANG SIXTO?

Yes, INSULT, since it was just like saying: “SINO BA KAYO SA AKALA NINYO  at ang dami ninyong hinihingi?

The PPCRV and the KBP just want to finish their job, which the Comelec had ALLOWED THEM TO DO. They weren’t demanding. They were NOT ALLEGING OR INSINUATING anything over the unaccounted for returns.

KAYA WALANG MORAL NA KARAPATAN si Tatang Sixto na BASTUSIN at tratuhiun sila na parang MGA ALILA na kwestyonable ang karapatan sa isang kahilingan.

Brillantes said the PPCRV should formally request for the manually uploaded poll returns, but has not done so.

Ipagpalagay nang tutoo ang katwiran ni Tatang Sixto.

Bakit hindi siya sumagot sa MAS DISENTE at MAS MAGINOONG paraan at pananalita? Nakalimutan na niya ba ang kagandahang asal?

O natural na niya ang pagiging AROGANTE at MAPANGINSULTO?

Most of all consider this very seriously, boys and girls: If there’s NOTHING TO HIDE in the manually uploaded returns, why can’t Tatang Sixto exempt the PPCRV and the KBP from the formal request requirement and just give them the documents?

Considering the URGENCY behind the returns, and the fact that IT’S NOT the fault of the two organizations that the votes these contain have not been accounted for, yet.

Nagtatanong lang, Tatang Sixto: MERON BANG HINDI DAPAT MAKITA ang PPCRV at KBP sa manually uploaded returns?

Walang samaan ng loob, tatang, pag binanatan ka ng husto sa media, ha. Ay kung MAGTATAMPO ka na naman na parang Grade 1 student at magbabantang magresign, siguraduhin mo lang na magiging TUNAY NA LALAKI ka at pangangatawanan mo.  30             

TAYO RIN ANG NAGPAPAHIRAP SA ATING SARILI!

The victor of Grace Poe and Bam Aquino in the senatorial polls is nothing less than a triumph of political immaturity and idol worship.

Only in the Philippines will you find two people, running for posts which they don’t have any related experience in or idea about, and still emerging among the top winners.

One of whom, Poe, even ending as the topnotcher.

The only record of Poe in public service was her short-lived stint as chairperson of the Movie and Television Review and Classification Board (MTRCB). That position doesn’t address poverty, unemployment, education, housing or any other major need of the poor.

And I dare anybody to disagree.

For Aquino’s stint in public service, he was only a ranking official of a government agency on youth affairs during the term of former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo.

That position had nothing to do with job generation, reducing the prices of oil products and basic commodities, peace and order and other national problems we’re facing.

Neither had Poe nor Aquino done anything which had helped improve the quality of life of a majority of the people anywhere, either as government officials or as private citizens.

So think about it, people:

Why make senators out of Poe and Aquino. What else could be a logical, and sane, reason, yo do so?

They’re victory was just like tapping the services of an architecture student to build a high-rise condominium building, or a medicine intern to treat a patient in near-death due to five or 10, diseases afflicting that person. 

“Or a hotel and restaurant management senior to manage a five-star hotel.

And as far as I know, being the daughter of Fernando Poe Jr. or a cousin of PNoy is not enough to qualify anyone as a senator. So what results or solutions to the country’s problems can we then expect from these two? 

Anong klaseng mga botante tayo?

Isang bagay lang ngayon ang mas malinaw pa sa sikat ng araw: TAYO RIN ANG NAGPAPAHIRAP[ S ATING SARILI, SA ATING BAYAN.  30

12-0 PNOY WIN CAN TRIGGER MARTIAL LAW!

To those who have forgotten, and to those who will vote for the first time today:  A 12-0 win by Pnoy’s senatorial bets can TRIGGER MARTIAL LAW or a dictatorship in the next three years.

Why? Just like in the House of Representatives, PNoy will have the majority of the Senate under his wings. In case you don’t know, the concurrence of the majority of both the Senate and the House is needed (under the law) to impose martial law.

Believe me guys, any senator or congressman would find it VERY, VERY DIFFICULT to turn down a request for support from the incumbent President. Especially if the Chief Executive is enjoying supposedly high popularity ratings.

I just won’t go into details but trust me, people, I’ve seen what I’m saying.

When that happens, not even the Supreme Court can stop it. Anybody correct me if I’m wrong.

I’m not being a prophet of doom. I’m just being realistic.

I’ve seen how power can corrupt government officials. We all have heard or read of various gimmicks in the past to possibly extend the six-year, single term of the President of the country, like constitutional amendments or ‘people’s initiative.’

I’m not saying that Pnoy will declare martial law, or will resort to other means to prolong his stay in Malacanang.

But whether Malacanang officials admit it or not, PNoy is just another politician who would love to stay in power for as long as he possibly can. He definitely is NO SAINT.

I won’t speculate, for now, on how will PNoy do it, JUST IN CASE.

But don’t dismiss the possibility of martial law before PNoy ends his term as pure exaggeration or call it whatever you like, on my part.

Remember, boys and girls, NOBODY expected former President Ferdinand Marcos to declare martial law, but he did. I remember PNoy’s dad, former Sen. Ninoy, as having exposed something to this effect in a speech.

But Ninoy was among the very first to be arrested when martial law was declared, since he didn’t expect it so soon.

We’ve all heard of the saying history repeats itself, haven’t we? 30

4 MORE TEAM PNOY BETS YOU SHOULD IGNORE!

Here are four more Team PNoy senatorial candidates who you should  throw into the garbage can when you  vote tomorrow: Loren Legarda, Chiz Escudero, Jamby Madrigal and Risa Hontiveros.

A common question for all – Have you heard or read of any law which they had PRINCIPALLY AUTHORED (meaning they were the ones who actually wrote it) which had  helped, among others, generate jobs,; bring  down prices of oil products, basic commodities and electricity rates;  reduce crime and poverty and increase the number of school buildings or classrooms?

Have you heard or read of any infrastructure project or program which any of them had launched as senators, and in the case of Hontiveros as party-list representative?

All of them TALK A LOT ABOUT HONESTY and other similar virtues.

But up to now, Legarda has NOT PRESENTED any documentary proof that her now notorious New York City, USA condo is owned by three others apart from her.

Even though documents on the property which had been obtained by media clearly showed that she was the sole owner. Adding insult to injury is Legarda’s CONFLCTING VERSIONS on where she got the money for the condo

In one news story, she said the money came form her ex-husband former Batangas Gov. Tony Leviste. But another news report quoted her as saying the money came from contributions to her campaign.

ALIN BA ANG TUTOO?

If I’m right, Escudero is the chair of the Senate Committee on Justice.  But have you heard him spearhead or call for vigorous inquires into questionable transactions or activities of the Aquino Government or anyone among PNoy’s boys?

Like jueteng, smuggling, the massacre of eight Hong Kong tourists at the Luneta during a hostage crisis, the disappearance of more than 2,000 (or was it 200) container vans of various goods from the Bureau of Customs, the slow and almost total INACTION by the Aquino Government into the slaughter of the Sulu sultan’s men in the raging Sabah crisis?

Escudero has also been publicly labeled as arrogant, drunkard and other similar ungentlemanly traits by the parents of her lover Heart Evangelista. He has even challenged to take a lie detector test.

And he has NOT AGREED to prove his innocence.

Risa Hontiveros was a party-list congresswoiman for three years./ But have you heard or do you know of EVEN ONBE pro-poor project or program, or infrastructure, which she had launched or built?

May narinig na ba kayong kahit isang grupo ng mga mahihirap na lantarang nagtsabi na gumaan ang buhay nbila sa tulong ni Hontiveros? May nabalitaan na ba kayong panukalang batas na sinulat niya para mabawasan ang kahirapan, at katiwalian tulad ng kaniyang campaign commercials?

For Madrigal, did you see or hear of even one bridge, road, school building or classroom or anti-poverty project which she had carried out or built during her first term as senator?

Do you or your friends know of even one landmark bill by her? If not, ask yourselves, why should she be senator again if she had not done anything during her first term?

MAGAGANDANG NGUMITI sina Legarda, Escudero, Madrigal at Hontiveros. Pero ito lang ba ang HALAGA O KATAPAT ng boto niyno? 30

4 TEAM PNOY BETS YOU SHOULDN'T VOTE FOR

Here are four Team PNOY senatorial bets YOU SHOULD NOT VOTE for: Sonny Angara, Antonio Trillanes, Bam Aquino and Alan Cayetano.

Tingnan ninyo ang GARAPALANG PANBOBOLA nila sa atin  noong nangangampanya pa sila:

Angara promised free education as a solution to poverty.

But up to now, HE HAS NOT given a DETAILED PLAN on how he’ll do it, and how can fats can he do it.

And anybody correct me on these if I’m wrong:

Angara has NO TRACK RECORD of anything that he had done, whether as a congressman or a private citizen, which resulted in the reduction of tuition anywhere.

He’s not a teacher, professor or school owner with several years experience who has the PROFESSIONAL RIGHT to speak on how to provide free education or to drastically reduce tuition.

Basta libreng edukasyon ang ipaglalaban niya, tapos. Saka na iyung detalye, kung meron man siya, kapag nanalo na siya. Isipin nnyo ito, KAHIT NA SINO SA ATIN, puwede ring mangako na ipaglalaban ang libreng edukasyon, pag nabigyan ng pagkakataon.

A Manila Times expose revealed hat Trillanes  traveled abroad 25 TIMES in just 21 MONTHS, or more than one trip a month,

But for the almost three years that he has been a senator, think about these, have you heard of or seen EVEN ONE PROJECT by Trillanes which has helped the lives of the people, especially the poor?

Whether or not it has been finished or started? Whether or not it’s an infrastructure, livelihood or skills training project?

Have you heard or read of EVEN ONE bill which he  had PRINCIPALLY AUTHORED (and not just riding on somebody else’s work)  which had helped, or can help, the greater majority of our people in any manner whatsoever?

The most commonly used slogan of Aquino was “Tatapusin na natin ang kahirapan.’

First: I have not heard of or read of any track record of Aquino on poverty reduction anywhere in the country.

Second, he’s not a banker, multi-millionaire businessman who made it on his own skill or one of the top bosses of any multi-million company who can influence investors to come into the country.

Neither is he a top-notch economist or investor/entrepreneur who’s an expert in creating jobs.  Anybody correct me on anything if I’m wrong.  If I’m not, how the hell can we expect Aquino to end, or even drastically reduce poverty?

Aquino is promising something of which he has NO VISIBLE OR PROVEN QUALIFICATION and TRACK RECORD to do so or to speak of. I’ll leave it to you, guys, on what kind of nerve, or face, does Aquino have.

Ang isa namang commercial ni Cayetano ay nangakop na tututukan niya ang mataas na presyo at trabaho.

Unang tanong:  May narining o nabalitaan na ba kayo na kahit isang bill o panukalang batas na SINULAT MISMO ni Cayetano na makakatulong para dumami ang trabaho at bumaba ang presyo ng mga bilihin?

Pangalawa: Kahit minsan ba ay nakita o nabalitaan na ba ninyo si Cayetano na UMIKOT sa mga PALENGKE o supermarket upang tingnan ang mga presyo ng mga bilihin? 

Third: Have you heard or read of any move by Cayetano to investigate the UNENDING PRICE INCREASES of basic commodities? Have you heard or read of even one instance when Cayetano questioned Labor and Finance officials on the rise in unemployment?

  

If you can’t think of any affirmative answers, then you need a psychiatrist if you’ll still vote for Cayetano.

Vote wisely, people.  Vote for our future, and not for what the surveys say or who has the cutest smile, the prettiest or the handsomest, or the sweetest campaign promise.

TAYO ANG MAHIHIRAPAN pagdating ng oras, HINDI ang kandidatong nagpabola kayo. 30 

PREPARE FOR THE WORST ON ELECTION DAY

With the admission by the Department of Energy (DOE) that a Luzon-wide blackout is still possible on Monday, Election Day, PREPARE FOR THE WORST boys and girls.

ANYTHING, as in anything, can happen if the blackout stretches well into the night, ESPECIALLY during the canvassing of votes.

Among others: PCOS MACHINES can be SWITCHED. FORGED BALLOTS and MANUFACTURED PCOS printouts can be swapped with LEGITIMATE ballots and RESULTS.

The same thing for the voters’ lists, and other documents of the election proceedings.

The Comelec has declared that generators are on standby, yes. But it COULD NOT ASSURE 100 percent that the generators WILL NOT BREAK DOWN for whatever reason or regardless of how long it will be used.

Power plants nga, bumibigay, generators pa..

Neither has the generators’ capacity been SPECIFIED IN DETAIL -- are they good even for an entire building or for just one or a few precincts?  Can the generators provide enough power even for all possible entrances for saboteurs or robbers and hoodlums?

Nor has it been established that there are ENOUGH GENERATORS FOR ALL the voting centers/precincts throughout Luzon,

.

Anybody correct me if I’m wrong.

I overheard in a TV newscast early this evening that the association of independent power producers  has assured the people of enough power for Monday.

Granting that the power supply itself is enough, what about the transmission? How reliable and stable, technically stable, are transmission lines. Have safeguards against sabotage, especially in election ‘hot spots.’ Been installed or are in place?

What are these, if any?

Bottom line, ladies and gentlemen, the DOE WILL NOT ADMIT the possibility of a LUZON-wide blackout if the chances are not that big, considering the Comelec generators and assurances of independent power producers.

Keep in mind, guys:  Our future for the next three years is at stake in the elections. And as I’ve said in an earlier blog, ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE under cover of darkness.30

SWS' TURN TO BRAINWASH THE PEOPLE!

MIND-CONDITIONING efforts in favor of PNoy’s senatoirial candidates are in FULL SWING, boys and girls.

Kung MAHAL NINYO ang mga SARILI NINYO, HUWAG kayong PALOLOKO!

It’s now the Social Weather Stations (SWS), which we all know was FOUNDED and is CONTROLLED up to now by people PUBLICLY KNOWN to have links with PNoy’s family and relatives, who is forecasting an overwhelming win for hisa bets – 9-3.

An inquirer.net story said the SWS’ basis was a supposedly non-commissioned TWO-DAY (May 2 and 3) survey with 2,400 registered voters nationwide as respondents.

Now, think about these, people:

As I had asked in my earlier blog on a Pulse Asia survey, can SWS prove that the supposed 2,400 respondents from all the 80 provinces in the country to make it a truly nationwide survey?

From what towns or cities were the supposed respondents?

For all we know, they were all from Tarlac or other known areas controlled by PNoy and his family and relatives. Or people who DEPEND on PNoy’s kin for a living, like their farm workers or employees.

If SWS will say that the purported respondents DID NOT COME from all the 80 provinces nationwide, then THEY’RE LYING to the max and simply FOOLING THE PEOPLE.

How was the supposed nationwide survey done if it only took them two days to finish it?

The personal pilot of a Makati-based businessman and a retired political liaison officer of a former senator both told me that unless at least 100 workers for every province would be used, it’s IMPOSSIBLE to conduct a truly nationwide survey through face-to-face interviews.

Now, if SWS will say that they did it through the Internet, who supplied them or how and where did they get the names of the supposed respondents? And WHAT IS THEIR PROOF that these people were registered voters?

Did they ask for proof, like voters’ IDs?

If SWS will say that they personally knew the supposed respondents, then that makes the results BIASED.

Kahit na sino sa atin, hindi basta-basta ipapahiya ang kaibigan sa isang maliit na pabor, lalo pa’t survey lang kuno.

So to the undecided, seriously consider everything I’ve said, first, before you even think of believing in SWS, and Pulse Asia surveys on the supposed overwhelming win of PNoy’s Senate bets.

Sa mga maniniwala sa surveys ng wala nang isip-isip, SWS at Pulse Asia na rin ang PABOTOHIN NINYO PARA SA INYO.

Tomorrow, I’ll write a blog on the REAL DANGER behind the SWS and Pulse Asia surveys and why we must be VERY VOCAL about their highly-doubtful accuracy and credibility. 30