SUSPICIOUS REPLIES BY SWS, PULSE ASIA

The refusal of the SWS and Pulse Asia to reveal if candidates in the May elections have paid them for surveys is both SUSPICIOUS AND REVEALING..

SWS legal counsel Albert Bacungan said: “Our position is that they (clients) did not pay for the survey. They are paying a fee to obtain access to certain data on non-commissioned questionnaire items.”

The data on non-commissioned questionnaire items are part of the survey. So if this is still not paying for the survey, what the hell do you call this, Mr. Bacungan?

Pulse Asia president Ronald Holmes said survey firms work independently, and it is their responsibility to conduct surveys with or without sponsors.

So if there are no sponsors, Mr. Holmes,  who pays for, or how do you pay for the salaries of your employees and office expenses?  You wouldn’t have the stomach to say they work for free, would you?

Both SWS and Pulse Asia say they are not required by law to disclose their sponsors.

That, I must admit, I wouldn’t know for sure. But remember, people, founders/officials of both the SWS and Pulse Asia are linked to the family of PNoy.

And as an old cliche goes, if there’s nothing to hide,then  there’s nothing to find.

Considering the long-held doubts on the accuracy and impartiality of their surveys, SWS and Pulse Asia should take this as a golden opportunity to prove that they’re as fair and factual as they profess to be.

When somebody skips a chance to prove his or her fairness and honesty, ,that person knows the truth is the contrary.

If SWS and Pulse Asia would not reveal the sponsors of their election surveys, and their source of income if they’ll say they have no sponsors, NASISIRAAN NA NG BAIT ang patuloy pa ring maniniwala sa kanila.30.

Tandaan ninyo, ,mga kababayan, hindi porke’t sinabi ng SWS at Pulse Asia ay TUTOO na, 30