THE MORE WE SHOULD NOT BELIEVE BIAZON!

Customs Commissioner Ruffy Biazon himself has given the people MORE REASONS to call for his ouster.

A manilastandardtoday.com story said in a press conference Friday, Biazon identified former Customs Deputy Commissioner Gallant Soriano as the “Mr. G.” who is spearheading efforts to destroy him with reports of rampant smuggling of agricultural and petroleum products.

For the record, I do not work for, and do not know, this Soriano. Now consider these, boys and girls:

When you say demolition, or black propaganda, that means TOTAL LIES or HALF-TRUTHS about you are being spread by some people to destroy your reputation.

First: Up to now, Biazon could NOT PRESENT DOCUMENTARY proof belying news reports that a total of P62 billion in taxes – P:32 billion from agricultural products and P30 billion from oil products,

Biazon had questioned the amounts. But he did not present his own figures and the basis for these.

So how can it be a demolition job? 

Unless he has papers as proof, it would appear that for Biazon, telling the truth is a demolition effort against the subject.

A TOTALLY UNDEMOCRATIC  pont of view.

Second: Biazon specifically accused Soriano. But again, HE DID NOT PRESENT ANY PROOF. And in a press conference, he neither confirmed nor denied pointing to Soriano as the brains  behind the supposed ouster campaign against him.

ANO BA TALAGA? Ang nakakatawa at NAKAKADUDA pa,  mga kababayan,  halos INABSWELTO rin agad ni Biazon si Soriano.

Biazon was quoted in the story as saying:: “I don’t know the person and I haven’t met the person. I don’t know him, so that’s it.”  Then, Soriano HAS NO REASON to lead supposed efforts to kick him out of office if they don’t even know each other.

Biazon said all he knew was Soriano wanted to be Customs commissioner. Again, no proof. Add to this Soriano’s categorical denial and declaration that he’s not evem applying to replace Biazon.

So, the questions:  Why did Biazon drag the name of Soriano if he NO PROOF WHATSOEVER?  What was his basis? Who fed the name to him? Did he do so on his own or on orders or advice of somebody?

If Biazon will deny naming Soriano, then where did the name come from and how did it reach media?

Shame on him if Biazon will say he also doesn’t know.

SIYA, at ang sariling tangapan niya, ang  sentro ng kontrobersiya, HINDI NIYA ALAM KUNG ANO ANG NANGYAYARI? 

Mas lalo siyang DAPAT MAG-RESIGN, AGAD! 30